goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
Yes, there are different rules for different things
How did you make it to whatever age you are in life? Lol
Let's Talk About Media
- Thread starter sturg33
- Start date
Yes, there are different rules for different things
How did you make it to whatever age you are in life? Lol
sturg33
I
Can somebody share the exact quote(s) of Trumps call for violence?
I'd like to look at it and see how it stacks up with other leaders call for violence
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Like, literally the last 4 years. Just randomly saying "people should just go burn down the capitol" is not equivalent to what Trump did. This is something that he has been building to for a long time. If he was ever in real threat of being removed during impeachment we would have seen this then.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I am not playing your game. You dismissed when people said he was inciting violence for 4 years. You tell me how so many people knew this was where his actions and words were leading? Maybe we are psychic.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
"With great power comes great responsibility". Trump for his own perceived political gain worked his retarded followers into a frenzy. Asked them to show in mass during the certification of the vote. Then told them to go fight for him. He might have said "peaceful protest" somewhere but by in large his words were to tell his cult to fight for him. Now I know what your saying. A lot of people use the word "fight" in a non-violent context. He convinced his cult that the countries election was rigged by China in a communist conspiracy to overthrow the legitimate government on the US. Then told them to go fight to save their country. I can drag you to water but I cant make you drink.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Its not about one singular statement.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
hmmmm
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
After watching clips of Fox News talking about Obama's rhetoric I came across a phrase that I think more accurately describes what Trump was doing. He was "baiting the lunatics". Inciting violence is a legally touchy subject. I am REALLY curious to see what role he or any of the people he appointed very late in his term had any role in sabotaging the defense. If there was a strong defense force at the Capitol the violence would have been minimal. I have seen a lot of finger pointing since the attack. Hopefully people keep an open mind about that investigation and dont rush to judgement given the era of fake news we live in.
Runnin
Well-known member
Here's an interesting article on the biases of different online news sites.
Website visits vs News media bias
Reliability vs Unique American visitors in July
oh, well.
Website visits vs News media bias
Reliability vs Unique American visitors in July
oh, well.
Last edited:
striker42
Well-known member
When you're flaunting the law, going around destroying property, and causing the deaths of innocent people, there shouldn't be a difference.
How we treat the underlying issues (police use of force vs belief of election fraud) can be different. How we treat those who descend into anarchy should be no different.
I condemn those who rioted last year and I condemn those who rioted at the capitol. You can agree with rioters and their grievances without agreeing with their methods.
