Let's Talk About Media

Jaw said:
You're not familiar with the recent Hispanic leader of the Proud Boys, or the guy who used to instigate at BLM rallies and did the same at the Capitol, before selling his video of the Capitol Police shooting to a couple of media outlets?
Click to expand...

oh i am familiar with both these gentlemen

what do you suppose their existence means?

as i said the insurrectionists are of mixed ideology...the white supremacists were well represented among them

Proud Boys have self-identified as "western chauvinists"...i suppose that gives them enough wiggle room to include someone like Tarrio in their ranks...but also enough wiggle room for a lot of other stuff that lies pretty close to white supremacy
 
nsacpi said:
oh i am familiar with both these gentlemen

what do you suppose their existence means?

as i said the insurrectionists are of mixed ideology...the white supremacists were well represented among them

Proud Boys have self-identified as "western chauvinists"...i suppose that gives them enough wiggle room to include someone like Tarrio in their ranks...but also enough wiggle room for a lot of other stuff that lies pretty close to white supremacy
Click to expand...

I suppose their existence makes efforts to racialize "white nationalism" but not the inner city violence that is majority a 13% race...absurd? intellectually dishonest? ridiculous? racist? I suppose any of those will do.
 
between western chauvinism and white supremacy is a little sliver of light...i see more similarity than difference Tarrio's presence notwithstanding...after all one of the guiding tomes of these groups is The Camp of the Saints, with all its phobia about population replacement (by people who look like Tarrio)...Steve Bannon has claimed it as one of his favorite books
 
Did either of you read the article or just post based on a headline and snarky comments. Seriously, critical thinking isnt helping either of you to tell reality from fake news.
 
I’m gonna post this here and in the lost their mind thread

So be ready for it in both spots.

[tw]1362930155140751363[/tw]
 
The commentator was right but for the wrong reasons. That dog should not be described as a presidential dog. No dog should be talked about in the same sentence with something as lowly as the presidency. Don't demean a dog like that!
 
cajunrevenge said:
Did either of you read the article or just post based on a headline and snarky comments. Seriously, critical thinking isnt helping either of you to tell reality from fake news.
Click to expand...

They never read the articles. Ever. Even when they're kind of crappy, they never say what the twatters they share say they say.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Did either of you read the article or just post based on a headline and snarky comments. Seriously, critical thinking isnt helping either of you to tell reality from fake news.
Click to expand...

No

Fraud never reads them

He enjoys the tweet that frames the point he likes

It doesn’t matter what the actual article says
 
zitothebrave said:
They never read the articles. Ever. Even when they're kind of crappy, they never say what the twatters they share say they say.
Click to expand...

I’d love for you and Cajun to then educate us how this article doesn’t effectively discourage looking at anything other than their approved sources.
 
Provide me a link to the article and I will read it. The link provided is just a screenshot of the headline. But again, did you even read the article?
 
cajunrevenge said:
Provide me a link to the article and I will read it. The link provided is just a screenshot of the headline. But again, did you even read the article?
Click to expand...

Google is your friend.

I just want to make sure what happened here though. You criticized someone’s take on an article with a position they didn’t read it and yet you didn’t read it? How would you know our take was accurate or not?

We don’t see the issue with his approach?

Continue on....
 
I want you to link it because then I will actually believe you read it. I said what I said based off context. The long history of fake news posted by Sturg. That the twatter post leads only to a screenshot of the headline and not the article itself. This is how fake news works. Someone posts a distortion of something real and a whole bunch of people take it on face value and go on to repeat it as if its fact spreading to more people in a very dishonest game of telephone. You and Sturgs **** is just so predictable I dont even need to go verify neither of you read the article. I also know you knew Trump was going to lose the election. No matter what you want to maintain publicly.
 
"The man who reads nothing at all is better educated than the man who reads nothing but the newspapers." - Thomas Jefferson
 
cajunrevenge said:
I want you to link it because then I will actually believe you read it. I said what I said based off context. The long history of fake news posted by Sturg. That the twatter post leads only to a screenshot of the headline and not the article itself. This is how fake news works. Someone posts a distortion of something real and a whole bunch of people take it on face value and go on to repeat it as if its fact spreading to more people in a very dishonest game of telephone. You and Sturgs **** is just so predictable I dont even need to go verify neither of you read the article. I also know you knew Trump was going to lose the election. No matter what you want to maintain publicly.
Click to expand...

That is not how fake news works.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top