January 6th insurrection thread...

thethe said:
[tw]1375562140757622787[/tw]

Another fake narrative dispelled.
Click to expand...

Literally what is highlighted there is absolutely meaningless to the screen grab of whatever article that it’s from that isn’t linked

But that screen grab certainly doesn’t say what your idiot source says it does
 
thethe said:
[tw]1375562140757622787[/tw]

Another fake narrative dispelled.
Click to expand...

The ruling was just, but that appears to be about whether or not they can be held without bail, not whether or not they’re guilty of their crimes?
 
mqt said:
The ruling was just, but that appears to be about whether or not they can be held without bail, not whether or not they’re guilty of their crimes?
Click to expand...

The idea of holding without bail implied a seditious act that required the defendants be remanded. Typically bail decisions indicate how severe the crimes are.
 
goldfly said:
Literally what is highlighted there is absolutely meaningless to the screen grab of whatever article that it’s from that isn’t linked

But that screen grab certainly doesn’t say what your idiot source says it does
Click to expand...

You should wake up every morning thanking your lucky stars that you didn’t have to be your sole provider.
 
thethe said:
The idea of holding without bail implied a seditious act that required the defendants be remanded. Typically bail decisions indicate how severe the crimes are.
Click to expand...

That’s not a false narrative, that’s poor application of the law by the Feds. I think we can both agree that Law Enforcement tends to get overzealous, so this isn’t a surprise that the charges might have been too severe.
 
mqt said:
That’s not a false narrative, that’s poor application of the law by the Feds. I think we can both agree that Law Enforcement tends to get overzealous, so this isn’t a surprise that the charges might have been too severe.
Click to expand...

It gets overzealous with a certain group of people.

Somehow the rioters from over the summer and from early 2017 didn’t get such harsh charges.

So yes, to me this was a false narrative peddled to get people looking away from obvious election fraud.
 
thethe said:
You should wake up every morning thanking your lucky stars that you didn’t have to be your sole provider.
Click to expand...

Well, here’s a twist for ya

I am

Lol

You and your friend try really hard on fantasy scenarios about me though. I’m flattered
 
mqt said:
The ruling was just, but that appears to be about whether or not they can be held without bail, not whether or not they’re guilty of their crimes?
Click to expand...


Hey, facts aren’t needed here

A screen grab of who appointed judges prove he’s right lol
 
thethe said:
It gets overzealous with a certain group of people.

Somehow the rioters from over the summer and from early 2017 didn’t get such harsh charges.

So yes, to me this was a false narrative peddled to get people looking away from obvious election fraud.
Click to expand...



So your mad that Trumps people didnt bring charges? And your mad at Democrats for that? They didnt bring charges because it was a hoax by the right wing media. Theres certainly a group of people who get worse charges but they vote overwhelmingly for Democrats.
 
Do we count the Antifa gathering at the Oregon capital as an insurrection or just a protest?

The pic of the limb run through the car into the passenger seat was pretty sad.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top