The biggest Metropolitan Areas without Baseball in USA:
Charlotte 2.6m (Hornets, Panthers)
Orlando 2.6m (Magic. MLS)
San Antonio 2.55m (Spurs)
Portland 2.49 m (Blazers, MLS)
Sacramento 2.36m (Kings)
Las Vegas 2.26 (Raiders, NHL)
Nashville 1.9m (Titans, NHL Predators)
Charlotte needs a team. Allthough if we did... they would have to be AL or I'm not sure I'd be able to support them.
I suppose that I should be fine with a Charlotte team as it would be more convenient than Atlanta and my kids might find that more useful, but I just feel like it would be a small market team without a whole lot of passion behind it.
But that's my general impression of Charlotte. Not anything worth getting excited about.
On a related note, I'm sure it would inconvenience my Braves access in one way or another. And it would probably hurt the Braves bottom line somehow. If I thought it would be a success and a good thing for the kids, I'd probably reluctantly support it. But I just seriously doubt that MLB would do well in Charlotte.
The biggest Metropolitan Areas without Baseball in USA:
Charlotte 2.6m (Hornets, Panthers)
Orlando 2.6m (Magic. MLS)
San Antonio 2.55m (Spurs)
Portland 2.49 m (Blazers, MLS)
Sacramento 2.36m (Kings)
Las Vegas 2.26 (Raiders, NHL)
Nashville 1.9m (Titans, NHL Predators)
What's the source of your feeling here? MiLB sets attendance records in Charlotte. Not sure why that wouldn't translate well to an MLB team.
Vegas!
I don't know. It would begin life not only as a small market, but one with two other professional sports franchises in town.
The Braves also dominate their target population to a much more intense degree than anything the Panthers or Hornets ever had to deal with.
With the exception of the early years of the Hornets (LJ and Mourning), I've never really sensed a hell of a lot of passion for professional sports from up there. I tend to wish them well enough, but not enough to follow closely.
I think the MiLB vs MLB dynamic and even target fan is a little different, but the AAA numbers are I guess somewhat encouraging. I understand the park is nice and that has certainly pushed attendance in a lot of places, but sometimes that MiLB thing is about ease and affordability. Not about connection to the team or winning or even watching a baseball game. I feel like you need a lot of more passionate investment in the product to support MLB numbers, but I might be dead wrong.
I kind of wonder if the Triangle wouldn't be as good or better a choice in NC. Faster growing. Further away from Atlanta.
Montreal and Vancouver seem like good choices on paper, but both cities have lost professional franchises for disinterest in recent past.
Montreal didn’t lose the team due to disinterest. They lost the team because they continually got screwed by MLB.
I kind of wonder if the Triangle wouldn't be as good or better a choice in NC. Faster growing. Further away from Atlanta.
Montreal and Vancouver seem like good choices on paper, but both cities have lost professional franchises for disinterest in recent past.
I sort of lean towards Portland, but I think that's just because I liked their stadium renderings.
I sort of lean towards Portland, but I think that's just because I liked their stadium renderings.
They had below average attendance for their last 20 years or so.
I was just tossing out Vegas somewhat as a joke. It would have to be a climate-controlled stadium (or else no night games) because summer in Vegas is unmercifully hot.
Yes, because MLB continually did them dirty.
I googled how MLB continually did Montreal dirty and came up empty.