Montreal didn’t lose the team due to disinterest. They lost the team because they continually got screwed by MLB.
montreal and screwjobs...name a more iconic duo
Montreal didn’t lose the team due to disinterest. They lost the team because they continually got screwed by MLB.
I googled how MLB continually did Montreal dirty and came up empty.
A lot of the problems stemmed from an ongoing inability to improve the stadium situation, which was not entirely an MLB problem (more of a problem of a community not willing to be held up by the team).
But, in a nutshell, a powerhouse team got stripped for parts after the ‘94 strike. Fan interest and attendance cratered. MLB tried to eliminate the franchise and lost in court, so it allowed the owner to **** off to the Marlins, looting the Expos on the way out.. MLB then took ownership of the club, played a really cynical game with the team—letting English-language broadcast rights lapse, playing games in Puerto Rico, while it waited for the opportunity to move it to DC.
So MLB certainly screwed the community and the club for a solid decade.
They still had a solid ballclub for their first two seasons under MLB ownership, thanks, of course, to the fact they had Vlad Guerrero, Jose Vidro, Brad Wilkerson, Javier Vazquez,
Grew up watching and taking baseball camps from these guys. Shane Andrews was there too. Their A ball affiliate was here.
Grew up watching and taking baseball camps from these guys. Shane Andrews was there too. Their A ball affiliate was here.
[TW]1393794091905916930[/TW]
Have a feeling players in general don't like Manfred and it could be a long offseason
Excellent post and I agree 100%. Pretty obvious what’s going to happen to the athletics and rays.So the possible relocation of the A's got me to thinking about what we may see in the next few years. The alignment of MLB could very well look a whole lot different than it is today. I'd even suggest it's likely. In trying to come up with the "most likely scenario", this is something I could see happen. This may not be ideal for the Braves and I'm not totally on board with this, but it's a very plausible thing. Here's my thoughts:
*It's not official by any means, but I think the A's are gone from Oakland. MLB telling them to start looking at other markets makes me believe as such. Cities are being thrown around, but from what I've seen today, the leader seems to be Las Vegas. That makes a ton of sense to me. Not sure MLB wants to make a difficult realignment by moving them east of the Mississippi.
*The Rays are talking to officials in the Tampa Bay area, but I have similar pessimism with them as I do with the A's and Oakland. They've been talking about as long as the A's and Oakland have. The Rays owner has thrown around the dumb idea of splitting a season in Tampa Bay and Montreal. I think this is setting the stage for a relocation of the Rays and the return of the Montreal Expos.
*After a CBA is agreed to and clarity with the A's and Rays, then comes expansion to 32 teams. Manfred wants it. So who gets the expansion teams? I look at two cities that already have organizations looking to bring MLB to their areas. One is Portland. I haven't looked at it in a while, but the Portland Diamond Project has been working to get MLB there. I don't know if he still is, but Seahawks QB Russel Wilson was (is?) a part of it. The other is, and I know this will cause some groans, Nashville. It will cut into the Braves fan base, but Nashville has also made a great effort to get MLB there and their work so far has been impressive. What Nashville brings as a city is also a plus.
So with all the above factors, there will be realignment. A scenario to me is four divisions in both leagues of four teams each. Now, as much as I would love to say the postseason structure would be easy, all division winners, Manfred will not want to decrease the number of playoff eligible teams. Last season's format will likely be a similar structure to the postseason in the future. Four division winners, four wild cards, best of three Wild Card Round, best of five Division Series, and best of seven in the LCS and World Series.
The above factors would result in a possible alignment like this, including two teams changing leagues:
NL East: Expos (after Rays relocate to Montreal), Mets, Phillies, Pirates
NL North: Brewers, Cardinals, Cubs, Reds
NL South: Braves, Marlins, Nationals, Nashville Franchise
NL West: Dodgers, Giants, Rockies, Padres
AL East: Blue Jays, Orioles, Red Sox, Yankees
AL North: Indians (or whatever they'll be called in the future), Tigers, Twins, White Sox
AL South: Astros, Diamondbacks, Rangers, Royals
AL West: A's (after relocation to Las Vegas), Angels, Mariners, Portland Franchise
This is just an idea of mine and far from a guarantee of all the above happening. Another thing such as another city being picked for expansion or the Rays staying and everything above is blown up.
Is bumgarner good again?
Why did the dodgers get 2 1b bench bats?
Maybe. Seems to be on quite a little roll after a horrendous start.
Think there is a bunch left in the tank but I can’t ignore that last year was a disaster.
Why not?
Just thought the dodgers liked bench players with versatility. Just seemed odd to me