Bachmanmania!

goldfly said:
she was most likely a member
Click to expand...

Nah, I can't say that. She did some good for good black folks back in the day and I agree with some of her methods, dumb poor people (especially blacks) who spread their legs to procreate so they can get more money from the government shouldn't have kids. That is the mindset I like about her. This is the same reason why people don't like me here. I believe in controlling the population and making people sterile after one abortion. I don't agree with killing innocent babies so the only way to do it is keep the female or male infertile and the "oops" won't happen, the innocent babies deserve better.

Yes warts and all but deep down she had issues.
 
AerchAngel said:
Nah, I can't say that. She did some good for good black folks back in the day and I agree with some of her methods, dumb poor people (especially blacks) who spread their legs to procreate so they can get more money from the government shouldn't have kids. That is the mindset I like about her. This is the same reason why people don't like me here. I believe in controlling the population and making people sterile after one abortion. I don't agree with killing innocent babies so the only way to do it is keep the female or male infertile and the "oops" won't happen, the innocent babies deserve better.

Yes warts and all but deep down she had issues.
Click to expand...

Doesn't that depend on your definition of "member"?? :icon_biggrin:
 
goldfly said:
wasn't worth the first time

much less the 2nd time

i read the words of great men that say all men are created equal and at the same time owned slaves.

the quote is from 1922

thankfully a lot has changed since then
Click to expand...

Does one of your patron saints embarrass you now?
 
BedellBrave said:
Yeah, I probably shouldn't have gone there.
Click to expand...

Ironic isn't it? Unborn babies who really aren't just a mass of protoplasm are considered to be such by those who find it easier to sanction their mass murder that way, while this very thread was originally a about Michelle Bachmann who really is just a mass or protoplasm but is considered to be otherwise by so many people. It's a little mind boggling.
 
KeithLockhart said:
Not sure if I agree with it being a dry spell.

It has more to do with issues IMO. Republicans have been extremely anti-***, using abortion over and over, and because people naturally assume Republicans are the rich whites, they also blame the GOP for the housing crisis recession.

I think McCain had a legitimate chance to win, it was selecting Palin that put the dagger in his campaign.

Romney would've been better off not selecting Paul Ryan.

Nobody saying Democrats are better, but they just seem to be the anti-loudmouth shove opinion down your throat.
Click to expand...

I think it's both a dry spell and they need to rethink which issues they highlight. I really don't think the *** thing is a big deal. I think the big issues they need to rethink are taxes and immigration. Their core message of self responsibility and civil liberties is what they need to get back to.

Look, you guys hate Paul Ryan, but he is actually a very good candidate. The dry spell is over now, imo. Lots of good candidates are going to be out there this election cycle compared to the last one. They just need to clean up their message and move it more toward Rand Paul's philosophy, but not too far right.
 
weso1 said:
I think it's both a dry spell and they need to rethink which issues they highlight. I really don't think the *** thing is a big deal. I think the big issues they need to rethink are taxes and immigration. Their core message of self responsibility and civil liberties is what they need to get back to.

Look, you guys hate Paul Ryan, but he is actually a very good candidate. The dry spell is over now, imo. Lots of good candidates are going to be out there this election cycle compared to the last one. They just need to clean up their message and move it more toward Rand Paul's philosophy, but not too far right.
Click to expand...

At the end of the day people vote on economics and sometimes abortion. Even most ***s vote the same way.
 
weso1 said:
I think it's both a dry spell and they need to rethink which issues they highlight. I really don't think the *** thing is a big deal. I think the big issues they need to rethink are taxes and immigration. Their core message of self responsibility and civil liberties is what they need to get back to.

Look, you guys hate Paul Ryan, but he is actually a very good candidate. The dry spell is over now, imo. Lots of good candidates are going to be out there this election cycle compared to the last one. They just need to clean up their message and move it more toward Rand Paul's philosophy, but not too far right.
Click to expand...

I agree - they'll have to soft-pedal on SSM and immigration. With the birthrate near or below replacement levels, strong anti-immigration pushes that are easily framed by the opposition as xenophobic and racist are dumb, imo.
 
Hey, this thread was about my lady, Michelle Bachmann! What happened? She's probably following this as a member of the House Intelligence Committee and is sorely disappointed that the discussion has turned away from her.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top