The Biden Presidency
- Thread starter The Tariff King
- Start date
https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/i1hdb623h3/econToplines.pdf
77. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Joe Biden is handling his job as President?
Strongly approve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19%
Somewhat approve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20%
Somewhat disapprove . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11%
Strongly disapprove . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39%
Not sure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12%
_________________________________
This is the Economist/YouGov poll which is traditional leftist.
39% approval rating.
81M votes was a fraud. The base never existed.
77. Do you approve or disapprove of the way Joe Biden is handling his job as President?
Strongly approve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 19%
Somewhat approve . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20%
Somewhat disapprove . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11%
Strongly disapprove . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39%
Not sure . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12%
_________________________________
This is the Economist/YouGov poll which is traditional leftist.
39% approval rating.
81M votes was a fraud. The base never existed.
Tapate50
Well-known member
This was interesting to me. I'd like to see more.
Right now the word is that law enforcement is sitting on it. Organizers have said if that persists they are making all data/video public and the video allegedly shows men coming out of cars in the middle of the night and dumping ballots from their backpacks into drop boxes.
You have to understand this goes hand and hand with the lack of chain of custody. This is how fraud is performed and its why the DOJ is doing everything possible to prevent any canvassing.
A couple of primary points here:
1) You’re drawing this conclusion from a very unpopular stretch of his presidency so far. Between the already divisive nature of leaving Afghanistan and the flawed way in which we went about it, in conjunction with the continued impact of COVID, this is a very turbulent month for Biden’s popularity. This is not meant to excuse Biden for these issues, and I’m not arguing his popularity issues are unfair to him. However, taking the polling right now as predictive of anything might be foolish. Republicans are also very unpopular right now and any relative bump for Trump could be due to the luxury of not having to govern right now. This works for prominent politicians on both sides, as they fall under less scrutiny for their words but get to rally against those in charge.
2) That 23% of unsure and slightly disapprove in addition to the 39% that approve would constitute a coalition that would be unbeatable in an election. Obviously it’s not as simple as taking all those without strong opposition to Biden and putting them on his side in 2020, but given the current state of things, it’s not unreasonable to think a good portion of those groups would have leaned Biden over Trump at the time.
An unpopular stretch? This is a result of disastrous policies not just in Afghanistan but at the border and with the economy.
Everything is falling apart and the American people are wise to it.
Again - Research what I am saying about the cell phone data and then the preliminary release of some Maricopa county canvassing.
Ballots sent to addresses where the person doesn't live there. Ballots sent to empty lots. People who are on record voting but say they didn't vote.
As I've said for a while. The left never thought Trump was going to get this many votes which is why they had to stop vote counting to bring in the fraudulent votes.
The courts will not stop this from coming out forever.
I could go on and discuss the almost statistical impossibility that Biden won the election but I suspect you aren't interested in hearing about that.
Tapate50
Well-known member
They had to grease his wife with a **** load of funding to get the last "tacos are infrastructure" bill through.
Some people are bad. It still shouldn’t come down to wealth to determine which person sits in jail before their trial.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I remember her taking hear for them bailing out someone charged with attempted murder of cops last year. He was found not guilty but you dont see that in your fake news feed.
Tapate50
Well-known member
I'm sure it was just a victim of bad circumstances, twice.
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
The Satanic Temple challenges new Texas abortion law citing religious freedom
The group, recognized as a church by the IRS, says the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act bans government from infringing on religion.
https://www.khou.com/article/news/l...-law/285-edf8b1f8-8605-4e6d-9331-afeefe1e5352
The group, recognized as a church by the IRS, says the Texas Religious Freedom Restoration Act bans government from infringing on religion.
https://www.khou.com/article/news/l...-law/285-edf8b1f8-8605-4e6d-9331-afeefe1e5352
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
Joe's request for the resignations of several Trump appointees to military academy advisory boards was interesting. By interesting, I mean, oh look, another Leftist ideological purity test, another case of departing from the norm, another way of politicizing and polarizing a role that should be neither of those things.
If you voted for Joe because you "wanted a return to normal" or "Trump was damaging the country" you either regret your actions, you're terribly ignorant, or you're a partisan joke. There's really no other option for supporting this train wreck.
If you voted for Joe because you "wanted a return to normal" or "Trump was damaging the country" you either regret your actions, you're terribly ignorant, or you're a partisan joke. There's really no other option for supporting this train wreck.
striker42
Well-known member
I actually think attacking Harris on this is off base. If bail is set by a judge and the defendant kills someone while out on bail, then it's a failure of the system, not the fault of the source of the bail money. Whether the defendant is a threat to the community is a consideration in whether bail is given and lets not forget that you have a constitutional right to a not excessive bail. If this guy had used a bail bondsman to get out then we wouldn't hear a word about this.
If you want to attack Harris on this it should be attacking her based on funds like this taking away some deterrence from law breaking. If people can break the law in protests (e.g. destroying property) and know they'll be bailed out by this fund and get nothing but a slap on the wrist, if that, then it can encourage illegal activities. That's not something that does anyone any good.