The Coronavirus, not the beer

Metaphysicist said:
Lol, still amazing how deaths magically spiked in early 2020 despite thethe’s crystal clear “exponent” proofs that COVID had been widespread for a year and we were nearing herd immunity or whatever your very-good-and-definitely-not-dumb theory was.

DRMhMOi.png


Anyway I’m sure you have an equally convincing explanation about how Fauci, Antifa, and the illuminati actually faked the death counts. But please continue to sing the tales of your “arguments” with me, years after the fact. It’s good to be remembered.
Click to expand...

All this tells me is that lockdowns caused the inflated death totals because we know for an almost certainty that COVID was around at the latest fourth quarter 2019.

So give whatever logic you want to give what I said was reality is what was proven.

You mocked me for even suggesting it and yet again I was right.
 
thethe said:
All this tells me is that lockdowns caused the inflated death totals because we know for an almost certainty that COVID was around at the latest fourth quarter 2019.
Click to expand...

Hm… *nods* uh-huh… Of Course! It was the… *checks notes*… lockdowns… that suddenly started killing 800 people a day in NYC March 2020 and overflowing the hospitals with folks in respiratory distress.

You are truly a Bud Real Man of Genius. Can’t wait for the commercial.
 
Metaphysicist said:
Hm… *nods* uh-huh… Of Course! It was the… *checks notes*… lockdowns… that suddenly started killing 800 people a day in NYC March 2020 and overflowing the hospitals with folks in respiratory distress.

You are truly a Bud Real Man of Genius. Can’t wait for the commercial.
Click to expand...

Yes - Forcing people to stay indoors in low ventilated areas in large apartment complexes absolutely caused higher rates of infection and death.

Instead - Everyone could have just lived on with their lives like humans have been doing for a long time.

But you keep on being arrogant despite being wrong on almost everything you've opined on the past 18 months.

Keep going buddy
 
Sorry can’t have higher rates of infection. It was already here and we were near herd immunity. You are forgetting your own very-smart-and-not-dumb theory.
 
Metaphysicist said:
Sorry can’t have higher rates of infection. It was already here and we were near herd immunity. You are forgetting your own very-smart-and-not-dumb theory.
Click to expand...

No - I am not forgetting it.

When you don't lock people down the rate of infection is lower.

Sorry thats too difficult for you to understand.
 
Ah, yes, the difference between everyone in NYC having it but no one dying and everyone in NYC having it and lots of people dying is… people spending an hour or two more inside per day on average. That makes MUCH more sense than “it probably started spreading widely when all those people died suddenly in a few week span.” Real genius **** right here. Nobel prize incoming.

What’s it like to having straight-up brain damage?
 
"deliberating"

I'm sure you are all stunned to know they voted 17-0 in favor.

But they were "deliberating!"

This age group has a 0.009% chance of dying of covid by the way

[tw]1453012306833641475[/tw]
 
Passed time to get some of that stock. It looks like all of Congress is in bed with them.

Fwiw- my two won’t be getting it.
 
Tapate50 said:
19 year old Cienna Knowles suspected of having the first case of Portal Venous Thrombosis caused by Pfizer vaccine.

Hospitalized hours after receiving her second jab.

https://www.news.com.au/lifestyle/h...e/news-story/286e7cd42e896b091e4b257322296a05

More articles on Duck Duck Go than Google btw...
Click to expand...
W
Perhaps this was the case yesterday morning, but I think it shows again, a poor understanding of the google algorithm.

I cannot compare the 2 overall, but there are thousands of results on google. I cannot imagine you combed through them all. And when you share the same last name as the most famous pop-star in the USA and you search from the USA you're likely gonna have some algorithm issues. Did you perchance search for her name and add in quote "clot"
 
It appears nsacpis favored approach of incentives for vaccination has been weighed and found wanting.

[tw]1453343436820594688[/tw]
 
zitothebrave said:
W
Perhaps this was the case yesterday morning, but I think it shows again, a poor understanding of the google algorithm.

I cannot compare the 2 overall, but there are thousands of results on google. I cannot imagine you combed through them all. And when you share the same last name as the most famous pop-star in the USA and you search from the USA you're likely gonna have some algorithm issues. Did you perchance search for her name and add in quote "clot"
Click to expand...

Why the **** would I need to understand the google algorithm?

I searched the exact same thing on both.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
Tapate50 said:
If the MMR vaccine was this ineffective would we still be required to take it?
Click to expand...

We both know the answer to that.

The percentage of people dying that are fully vaccinated continues to climb and are now getting close to be in line with the total percentage of fully vaccinated.

That is not a good sign.
 
Jaw said:
It appears nsacpis favored approach of incentives for vaccination has been weighed and found wanting.

[tw]1453343436820594688[/tw]
Click to expand...

I’ll take the L there too. I preferred using the carrot to the stick (if we had to choose). Maybe states designed these incentive programs poorly, maybe the prizes weren’t high enough…or maybe it’s ultimately just ineffective. I could certainly see some vaccine hesitant folks going the other way and being more skeptical when an incentive is offered. Could be the size of that group was underestimated.
 
acesfull86 said:
I’ll take the L there too. I preferred using the carrot to the stick (if we had to choose). Maybe states designed these incentive programs poorly, maybe the prizes weren’t high enough…or maybe it’s ultimately just ineffective. I could certainly see some vaccine hesitant folks going the other way and being more skeptical when an incentive is offered. Could be the size of that group was underestimated.
Click to expand...

I actually don't have a problem with the idea, and definitely prefer it to mandates. I was really just trying to draw him out.
I think too many people have too much of their identity tied up in the mask/anti-mask and vaxx/anti-vaxx debate for anything to break through it at this point. What a country.
 
They should offer no federal income taxes for 3 years if you get fully vaccinated starting today. If you already are, too bad lol

I'd do it
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top