Better outcomes, more freedom, and lower cost.
Which party do you suppose would oppose these?
Well it’s empowering people to make their own decisions and it’s a new system replacing an old, traditional way of doing things, so I’d assume the party that refers to itself as “liberals” or “progressives” supports it, no?
OK, without trying to start a flame war, can you each of you tell me what you do for a living? What is your profession, etc.? Just the basics, no need to go into depth.
Sounds like the frequent setup of "You aren't teachers so you don't know whats best for education...."
OK, without trying to start a flame war, can you each of you tell me what you do for a living? What is your profession, etc.? Just the basics, no need to go into depth.
What does that have to do with school choice?
No, not at all, but I guess that makes as much sense as "anyone but a teacher knows what's best for education".
I seem to remember that you work in the financial neck of the woods though I don't recall the specifics. So, tell me more.
FP&A / Global Consolidations / SEC Reporting / System Integration
Those are my main verticals.
So, the financial industry, stock market, domestic and foreign concerns, and the legalities involved with all that stuff? Cool.
By the way, before we go any further, I absolutely agree that our public school system needs some serious attention. I teach at a community college and have for the past 22 years. I definitely know that our public schools aren't preparing our young people for college or anything else for that matter. I'm consistently amazed that some of my students can find their way to school every day, let alone do what they're supposed to after they get there.
Is this a decent start?
No legal. Would never want to touch that.
Not directly involved with the stock market just reporting that goes to the SEC.
I love system integration and relational databases. Learning more and more coding every day. So, you're more in the technical side of the financial industry (for lack of a more precise term"? I agree about coding. I know how to do some HTML stuff, had learn when we went into online education a little over 20 years ago. I enjoy coding but I don't know nearly enough about it to even call myself a novice, let alone anything higher than that. By the way, the governor of AR had ordered that a certain amount of coding be included in the K12 curriculum for a couple of years now. I like that, though I'm afraid in the end it'll probably just help to create a larger new generation of hackers. lol
The whole concept of schooling as we know it today is nonsense. Half the stuff being taught is useless and the other half isn't effective because the overall aptitude of teachers these days leaves a lot to be desired. The aptitude of the overall teacher population has gone downhill over the past few decades. Do you know why that is? The teachers union certainly isn't the primary cause of that. As for the curriculum I think that varies a lot depending on the school and the part of the country we're talking about. I know when I taught Spanish in the public schools of OK we had certain state based outcomes we had to meet but as for what material I taught and how I taught it that was totally up to me. I am and always was open to discussion and debate about what needed to be taught and how best to teach it.
I've long wanted privatization of schooling. Let parents decide who teaches their kids and what is taught to them. I'm not against letting parents decide what's best for their kids though that is a MUCH bigger kettle of fish than what you seem to realize. Sure there are lots of good parents who want to do what's right and want their kids to do the same, but if you wonder why so many kids are dumb asses all you need to do is to meet their parents. It's really not a simple problem and there are no simple solutions, including privatization. You're assuming a whole lot with both parts of this statement.
Schools also need to start offering financial literacy training and early. Accounting should be taught to kids in high school at the latest. We agree 110% on this one. Kids need more real world skills and they sure aren't getting them in the public schools now, nor have they in a LONG time. So many of the students I have can't balance a pencil on their finger let alone a checkbook.
I work in the commercial insurance industry.
I have two young kids in public school - for now.
I agree about coding. I know how to do some HTML stuff, had learn when we went into online education a little over 20 years ago. I enjoy coding but I don't know nearly enough about it to even call myself a novice, let alone anything higher than that. By the way, the governor of AR had ordered that a certain amount of coding be included in the K12 curriculum for a couple of years now. I like that, though I'm afraid in the end it'll probably just help to create a larger new generation of hackers. lol Coding should be taught in elementary school within the confines of Math Logic courses. Its one in the same
The aptitude of the overall teacher population has gone downhill over the past few decades. Do you know why that is? The teachers union certainly isn't the primary cause of that. As for the curriculum I think that varies a lot depending on the school and the part of the country we're talking about. I know when I taught Spanish in the public schools of OK we had certain state based outcomes we had to meet but as for what material I taught and how I taught it that was totally up to me. I am and always was open to discussion and debate about what needed to be taught and how best to teach it. Math Math Math Math. And for those that are clearly not 'getting it' (which is fine) then you shift towards trades. Of course at the elementary level is when you do general introduction to all disciplines but by the time junior high school rolls around we should be directing these children to what they do best. No more square pegs in round holes.
I'm not against letting parents decide what's best for their kids though that is a MUCH bigger kettle of fish than what you seem to realize. Sure there are lots of good parents who want to do what's right and want their kids to do the same, but if you wonder why so many kids are dumb asses all you need to do is to meet their parents. It's really not a simple problem and there are no simple solutions, including privatization. You're assuming a whole lot with both parts of this statement. Parents are not innocent in the process but the substitution of traditional academic learning for what we are seeing now is poisoning chidlrens minds