Rittenhouse trial

Jeff Tiedrich
@itsJeffTiedrich
·
17h
hey, remember that ****face who shot Rep. Steve Scalise?

of course you don't. his name has been forgotten.

the " left" didn't turn him into some ****ed up folk hero
 
Jeff Tiedrich
@itsJeffTiedrich
·
17h
hey, remember that ****face who shot Rep. Steve Scalise?

of course you don't. his name has been forgotten.

the " left" didn't turn him into some ****ed up folk hero

Gets dumber by the day.
 
Jeff Tiedrich
@itsJeffTiedrich
·
17h
hey, remember that ****face who shot Rep. Steve Scalise?

of course you don't. his name has been forgotten.

the " left" didn't turn him into some ****ed up folk hero

You really do believe he should have been convicted of murder, don't you?

But you have no idea why other than the TV box telling you.

It's so pathetic
 
I dunno you've been jibberjabbering about pedophiles. I assumed anyone associated with any side associated with a pedophile was wrong. Like confirmed creep Ted Nugent.
 
You guys seem to have forgotten that Scalise was assaulting that dude that shot him. Otherwise 57s retweet wouldn't make any sense at all.
 
260207368_261077806123801_6106846310897505031_n.jpg
 
[tw]1462643699679211520[/tw]

The left is nothing but a terrorist organization now spreading propaganda.

When we take back power organizations like occupy democrats will be harassed until they cease to exist.

57 is sharing poison that leads to the deaths of innocent people. Just a communist piece of ****.
 

Not a perfect analogy as the polar bear enclosure is a place you have no legal right to be while a public street is a place you should be able to walk legally.

However, it does get at the point that this kid is a moron, perhaps even reckless. It's possible that a conviction could have been gotten if the charges had been based more on recklessness. The punishment would have been less and there would have been an outcry when he was charged but there would have been a greater chance of a conviction. Instead they overcharged him and the prosecution's case had to be about trying to prove that higher level which they couldn't do.
 
Not a perfect analogy as the polar bear enclosure is a place you have no legal right to be while a public street is a place you should be able to walk legally.

However, it does get at the point that this kid is a moron, perhaps even reckless. It's possible that a conviction could have been gotten if the charges had been based more on recklessness. The punishment would have been less and there would have been an outcry when he was charged but there would have been a greater chance of a conviction. Instead they overcharged him and the prosecution's case had to be about trying to prove that higher level which they couldn't do.

He's just posting the dumbest **** he can find to fan the flames. You are talking passed the guy. He saw white guy and wanted him in jail.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
I ask again why Rittenhouse's attacker is not facing charges and a trial?

One of the Rekieta Law panel said the DA has been delaying it so testimony and evidence from that charge couldn't be used in Rittenhouse's favor.
 
Not a perfect analogy as the polar bear enclosure is a place you have no legal right to be while a public street is a place you should be able to walk legally.

However, it does get at the point that this kid is a moron, perhaps even reckless. It's possible that a conviction could have been gotten if the charges had been based more on recklessness. The punishment would have been less and there would have been an outcry when he was charged but there would have been a greater chance of a conviction. Instead they overcharged him and the prosecution's case had to be about trying to prove that higher level which they couldn't do.

The correct analogy would be a bunch of polar bears got loose and starting ****ing up **** everywhere in the zoo... and a worker decided he was going to go and try to protect those areas... and when one of psyco racist polar bears attacked that worker, the worker shot the bear.
 
Back
Top