NinersSBChamps
<B>Voted Worst Poster <br> 2015 (Co-Winner)</BR>20
The polar bear analogy is perfect because polar bears are white.
Rittenhouse trial
- Thread starter Krgrecw
- Start date
NinersSBChamps
<B>Voted Worst Poster <br> 2015 (Co-Winner)</BR>20
You know the left was rooting for the driver to be a white person. Now it’s not so there won’t be much coverage on it.
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
Oh they'll cover it. They'll mention some reason for why he was doing it that had nothing to do with race or politics every time they do. I hope they're right.
They certainly won't be digging into his social media history, group affinities or membership, or inventing scenarios where it could have been done for nefarious reasons. So the exact opposite of what they did with Rittenhouse.
If it does turn out to be politically or racially motivated they'll quickly qualify it as a reaction to racism/oppression/systemic injustice/righteous anger/whatever and then quickly stop covering it before they have to prove themselves wrong.
They certainly won't be digging into his social media history, group affinities or membership, or inventing scenarios where it could have been done for nefarious reasons. So the exact opposite of what they did with Rittenhouse.
If it does turn out to be politically or racially motivated they'll quickly qualify it as a reaction to racism/oppression/systemic injustice/righteous anger/whatever and then quickly stop covering it before they have to prove themselves wrong.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
NinersSBChamps
<B>Voted Worst Poster <br> 2015 (Co-Winner)</BR>20
Apparently this POS was at least a BLM supporter and it sounds like intent to hurt as many people as possible. Under almost every administration this is terrorism.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
It is a terrorist attack. Calling it anything else is insane.
Jaw
It's OVER 5,000!
Again, I am not a consumer of Fox, OAN, NewsMax, Rush, Hannity, etc. I have no problem with anyone calling them biased rightwards. I have not, do not, and will not claim otherwise.
My problem is with the many, many, many, more outlets that are as biased in the other direction but are considered mainstream, or unbiased, or more reliable, or more trustworthy. They are not, don't want to be, and don't try to be.
57Brave
Well-known member
Duty To Warn Speaker with one sound wave
@duty2warn
·
1h
Putting aside the allegations, cases, and even the verdicts - I am struck by the difference between the clownish courtroom of the Rittenhouse trial and the appropriate courtroom of the Arbery murder trial.
Judge Schroeder is an insult and embarrassment to American jurisprudence.
No telling Rittenhouse's future
but life tells me this isn't the last of him
It could then be argued Rittenhouse did not get a fair trial
@duty2warn
·
1h
Putting aside the allegations, cases, and even the verdicts - I am struck by the difference between the clownish courtroom of the Rittenhouse trial and the appropriate courtroom of the Arbery murder trial.
Judge Schroeder is an insult and embarrassment to American jurisprudence.
No telling Rittenhouse's future
but life tells me this isn't the last of him
It could then be argued Rittenhouse did not get a fair trial
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
People seek out news that tells them what they want to hear. It doesnt matter who has more media, there are more than enough RW sources. Fox up until they were deemed to not be propoganding hard enough by Trump was the largest and most watched cable news. Maybe theres less conservative media because theres less conservative audience? Maybe there are considered less mainstream and reliable because the majority of people are liberal?
It’s obvious, they’d rather have pedos and guys that beat women on the street than a kid with a gun.
I agree with this. I still think that it was a series of major lapses in judgement that led to Rittenhouse being in the situation, but have no concerns with the verdict.
the looters should be in jail.