Can 57 or goldy explain to me in their own words how the "shocking" texts prove some sort of coordinated conspiracy of a coup?
Seth Cotlar
@SethCotlar
·
20h
Just so we’re clear, several on screen hosts at Fox News,
the station that complains that “the media” is in cahoots with Democrats,
were on a texting basis with Mark Meadows and urged the
President to take specific actions on Jan 6.
This doesn’t change my view of 1/6, but I do think this is a fun point. In addition to the obvious hypocrisy pointed out here, it also pours some serious cold water on any takes Hannity, Ingraham, Kilmeade and Don Jr. have had about 1/6 being a false flag or a simple peaceful protest. If they thought it was nothing, what would Trump making a strong public statement solve? The supposed plants wouldn’t care, and if nobody was violent there would be no violence to stop.
Because they knew the left would drive this narrative.
This isn't hard and very consistent with the mindset it wasn't a big deal (although people who broke laws should be prosecuted) and the left is hyperventilating for political power.
“This is killing his legacy” and “this is out of control” are very normal things people privately text the President’s chief of staff when they don’t think it’s a big deal.
Oh by the way, found a couple more voter frauds cases
Yet again; only in trumps favor lol
[tw] 1470782653641236488[/tw]
This is basically what I was getting at in my last post. I think calling this an organized tactical strike on our Democracy is nonsense, and probably is contributing to the Right’s harsh turn on messaging. If we had called it what it was, which is a bunch of idiots doing illegal things rather than roping the President into it and claiming he directly caused the ruckus, perhaps we’d be in a better place.
Can 57 or goldy explain to me in their own words how the "shocking" texts prove some sort of coordinated conspiracy of a coup?
Fraud boy still here not actually addressing the content of the text messages lol
Now up to 12-0.