The Coronavirus, not the beer

Anyone realize there’s been a 2 million dollar payday on the table for anyone in the medical profession to debate on media the efficacy and treatment protocols we followed ?
 
The entire Nets team is testing positive but they won't let Kyrie play bc he's unvaccinated

Weird, right?

[TW]1472243910625873927[/TW]
 
FG4-dHCXMAM45uy
 
Here is the next made up crisis based on biased sources.

The internal polling must look even worse than what the externals are telling us.

Desperation!
 
sturg33 said:
After two years you'd think he would have time... I know he was busy doing magazine covers and Disney documentaries... but his predictions and prescriptions have been total ****

[Tw]1472257673311801350[/tw]
Click to expand...

https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/how-our-federal-overseers-do-science/

Phil Magness, that irrepressible foe of statism, managed to obtain emails between White House chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci and NIH director Francis Collins in which they hatch an attack on the Great Barrington Declaration. (The GBD was authored by three well-known epidemiologists, arguing that the best approach to COVID was not locking down, but targeted protection for the truly vulnerable.)

Dissent from the federal government’s chosen strategy was quite unwelcome. “There needs to be a quick and devastating takedown of its premises,” Collins wrote in reference to the GBD. Real scientists would investigate the premises first, then decide if the declaration should be subject to a “takedown,” but no such thing ever happened. The authors were disparaged, their motives impugned, their conclusions ridiculed, but one looks in vain for anything like a scientific counter-argument.

It’s enough to make you suspect that the real objective of Fauci and friends was expansion of government authority rather than protection against disease.

------------

Yeah, I'd say it's unlikely we get a public debate when they've already declared themselves the arbiters of truth.
 
acesfull86 said:
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/how-our-federal-overseers-do-science/

Phil Magness, that irrepressible foe of statism, managed to obtain emails between White House chief medical adviser Anthony Fauci and NIH director Francis Collins in which they hatch an attack on the Great Barrington Declaration. (The GBD was authored by three well-known epidemiologists, arguing that the best approach to COVID was not locking down, but targeted protection for the truly vulnerable.)

Dissent from the federal government’s chosen strategy was quite unwelcome. “There needs to be a quick and devastating takedown of its premises,” Collins wrote in reference to the GBD. Real scientists would investigate the premises first, then decide if the declaration should be subject to a “takedown,” but no such thing ever happened. The authors were disparaged, their motives impugned, their conclusions ridiculed, but one looks in vain for anything like a scientific counter-argument.

It’s enough to make you suspect that the real objective of Fauci and friends was expansion of government authority rather than protection against disease.

------------

Yeah, I'd say it's unlikely we get a public debate when they've already declared themselves the arbiters of truth.
Click to expand...

Fauci is science, brah
 
There hasn't been public debate on any of the lefts hoaxes for the last ten years.

Just unsupportable assertions backed by universal dominance of popular culture through social media and hollywood.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top