nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
Why do we need vaccines or ivermectin when i can just wear a mask?
u one smart dude
Why do we need vaccines or ivermectin when i can just wear a mask?
wo...they enrolled people within the first week of onset of symptoms....blows my mind...thanks for catching that and sharing it thethe
what a ****ing moron you are
You're the fool who still tries to provide studies to disprove something that was never said. You're a great lapdog for Big Pharma though. They appreciate the free distribution of their Deza.
Its ok - You're losing it. We can all see the meltdown after all your positions have been shown to be hilariously wrong. One day those Germans will get here bud....one day.
um...i miss-posted earlier...should read what a mother****ing cocksucking moron you are
um...i miss-posted earlier...should read what a mother****ing cocksucking moron you are
Meltdown in full swing.
Homophobe too
Let me know when the U VA trial results are in.
Meanwhile:
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35179551/
Results: Among 490 patients included in the primary analysis (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [8.7] years; 267 women [54.5%]), 52 of 241 patients (21.6%) in the ivermectin group and 43 of 249 patients (17.3%) in the control group progressed to severe disease (relative risk [RR], 1.25; 95% CI, 0.87-1.80; P = .25). For all prespecified secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences between groups. Mechanical ventilation occurred in 4 (1.7%) vs 10 (4.0%) (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-1.30; P = .17), intensive care unit admission in 6 (2.4%) vs 8 (3.2%) (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.27-2.20; P = .79), and 28-day in-hospital death in 3 (1.2%) vs 10 (4.0%) (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09-1.11; P = .09). The most common adverse event reported was diarrhea (14 [5.8%] in the ivermectin group and 4 [1.6%] in the control group).
Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, ivermectin treatment during early illness did not prevent progression to severe disease. The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.
But I understand it "worked" for a couple of your relatives. By all means carry on.
Clown. All that “intelligence” and you don’t see a thing.
Cool, bro. What about these studies? https://c19ivermectin.com/
Same website has studies that melatonin is effective
https://c19melatonin.com/meta.html
You look at their list of treatments and the only one on the website that meets the standards, conv plasma is the only negative.
[tw]1502978175235731467[/tw]
Majority of Americans know the reality. Now that we are watching the results will shock people. Seats that were believed to be +8-12 D are up for grabs now.
[tw]1502978175235731467[/tw]
Majority of Americans know the reality. Now that we are watching the results will shock people. Seats that were believed to be +8-12 D are up for grabs now.
I think your full of **** and election integrity is pretty high in my list considering you tickets tried to overturn the results and have signaled that they will do it again I'm 2024 except this time they might have enough pre planning to pull it off. Which you think would be great but in reality the country would shut down.
Your side knows it cant win in a court of law which is why they resort to propaganda.
I mean when the same crew spent years trying to find anything Hillary did wrong in Benghazi, and still believe she's guilty, it's all you need to know. They don't care about facts. They only care about their perceived truths.
The silly part about this is the reps could have soared into 2022 and 2024 on Biden basically being a fool with a more attractive Candidate than Trump. INstead they're fully invested in Trump. Which means he'll just keep dragging them to the bottom, like he has with countless business operations.