January 6th insurrection thread...

Cajun, wait for rt and the other Russian state media to tell you what’s up about this

That = “doing your own research” to these clowns
 
[tw]1502031199740571658[/tw]


https://emeralddb3.substack.com/p/a...m?r=2d06&s=r&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web

Halderman claims that “Georgia voters face an extreme risk that [electronic voting machine]-based attacks could manipulate their individual votes and alter election outcomes.” Since Halderman is a well known election security expert who has testified before Congress, the usual attempts to discredit Halderman as either a conspiracy theorist or an amateur have not been successful.

....

In February of 2022, Halderman sent his complete report only to CISA and to Dominion Voting Systems. What was the response from the federal agency supposedly tasked with keeping America’s voting systems secure, and the company responsible for the machines used in Georgia? CISA and Dominion both filed emergency motions to keep Halderman’s report sealed from the public.

_____________________

Its all going to come out. As I said from the very beginning. The strategy from the Establishment was brilliant. Delay Delay Delay until people just lose interest.

Can someone get Sidney Powell on the line?
 
Last edited:
Its all going to come out
Click to expand...

you have been saying this everyday you came back after your disappearance after he lost

always a carrot to chase for the maga crowd but never really "the truth"

cast enough doubt that it's all bs etc to keep it alive for the lemmings to keep chasing that carrot
 
at some point in the future thethe will start saying that all his posts in this thread were during a period when he was mentally unwell but now we should pay attention to him because he has put the period of mental unwellness behind him...kind of how he excuses aspects of his Islamophobic past (the anti-Uyghur posts, sharia coming to Queens, the Las Vegas shooter having a Muslim gf).
 
nsacpi said:
at some point in the future thethe will start saying that all his posts in this thread were during a period when he was mentally unwell but now we should pay attention to him because he has put the period of mental unwellness behind him...kind of how he excuses aspects of his Islamophobic past (the anti-Uyghur posts, sharia coming to Queens, the Las Vegas shooter having a Muslim gf).
Click to expand...

So when do you want to actually try and refute any of the findings from places like Arizona/Wisconsin/Georgia?

Just pretend they don't exist like you do with Durhams findings on "russian Collusion" and Hunter Bidens laptop?
 
Is nsacpi comfortable with private groups like Zuckerberg effectively running elections?

Is nsacpi comfortable with machine companies who state that just performing an audit on their machines make them unusable?

Is nsacpi comfortable with counting sites putting boards up on their windows so not all legally appointed counters can observe?

Is nsacpi comfortable with illegal ballot harvesting operations around the country?

Is nsacpi comfortable with county boards lying on twitter and then changing their story when in front of a congressional committee?
 
thethe said:
Is nsacpi comfortable with private groups like Zuckerberg effectively running elections?

Is nsacpi comfortable with machine companies who state that just performing an audit on their machines make them unusable?

Is nsacpi comfortable with counting sites putting boards up on their windows so not all legally appointed counters can observe?

Is nsacpi comfortable with illegal ballot harvesting operations around the country?

Is nsacpi comfortable with county boards lying on twitter and then changing their story when in front of a congressional committee?
Click to expand...

these could be the basis for an actual discussion

but i don't think they are well-predicated for the most part

just give it up
 
nsacpi said:
these could be the basis for an actual discussion

but i don't think they are well-predicated for the most part

just give it up
Click to expand...

Give it up? When over time the argument has only gotten more supported? You'd love that.

This is the exact opposite of the Deza you pushed for years.

If after the Wisconsin report you aren't at least skeptical then you are effectively admitting you are happy with the results of a stolen election which is fine. I always knew that is where you stood. You're doing the same thing you did with Russian Collusion and IMpeachment. Pretend that contradictory evidence doesn't exist that completely destroys your arguments.
 
you lost man

get over it or go hide like the couple months you were gone after the election

now back to the traitors that tried to stop the democratic process from happening...
 
nsacpi said:
at some point in the future thethe will start saying that all his posts in this thread were during a period when he was mentally unwell but now we should pay attention to him because he has put the period of mental unwellness behind him...kind of how he excuses aspects of his Islamophobic past (the anti-Uyghur posts, sharia coming to Queens, the Las Vegas shooter having a Muslim gf).
Click to expand...

It wouldn’t surprise me if you did the same. So I’m not sure I’d be throwing stones
 
Tapate50 said:
Yeah it’s obviously all over with for Ivermectin

https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/me...dy-of-possible-covid-19-treatments/ar-AAU8jet

You can come back and say your last two years were just a meltdown . It would explain a lot . We won’t judge
Click to expand...

Let me know when the U VA trial results are in.

Meanwhile:

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35179551/

Results: Among 490 patients included in the primary analysis (mean [SD] age, 62.5 [8.7] years; 267 women [54.5%]), 52 of 241 patients (21.6%) in the ivermectin group and 43 of 249 patients (17.3%) in the control group progressed to severe disease (relative risk [RR], 1.25; 95% CI, 0.87-1.80; P = .25). For all prespecified secondary outcomes, there were no significant differences between groups. Mechanical ventilation occurred in 4 (1.7%) vs 10 (4.0%) (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.13-1.30; P = .17), intensive care unit admission in 6 (2.4%) vs 8 (3.2%) (RR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.27-2.20; P = .79), and 28-day in-hospital death in 3 (1.2%) vs 10 (4.0%) (RR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.09-1.11; P = .09). The most common adverse event reported was diarrhea (14 [5.8%] in the ivermectin group and 4 [1.6%] in the control group).

Conclusions and relevance: In this randomized clinical trial of high-risk patients with mild to moderate COVID-19, ivermectin treatment during early illness did not prevent progression to severe disease. The study findings do not support the use of ivermectin for patients with COVID-19.



But I understand it "worked" for a couple of your relatives. By all means carry on.
 
Last edited:
Design, setting, and participants: The Ivermectin Treatment Efficacy in COVID-19 High-Risk Patients (I-TECH) study was an open-label randomized clinical trial conducted at 20 public hospitals and a COVID-19 quarantine center in Malaysia between May 31 and October 25, 2021. Within the first week of patients' symptom onset, the study enrolled patients 50 years and older with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, comorbidities, and mild to moderate disease.

Keep going with your Big Pharma Deza
 
thethe said:
Design, setting, and participants: The Ivermectin Treatment Efficacy in COVID-19 High-Risk Patients (I-TECH) study was an open-label randomized clinical trial conducted at 20 public hospitals and a COVID-19 quarantine center in Malaysia between May 31 and October 25, 2021. Within the first week of patients' symptom onset, the study enrolled patients 50 years and older with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19, comorbidities, and mild to moderate disease.

Keep going with your Big Pharma Deza
Click to expand...

wo...they enrolled people within the first week of onset of symptoms....blows my mind...thanks for catching that and sharing it thethe

what a ****ing moron you are
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top