January 6th insurrection thread...

I did. They should all be prosecuted vigorously. None of them show any widespread voter fraud, only isolated idiots. Same with the Trump tards.
 
He already knows they could find 100k ballots turned in by a ballot harvester and it wouldn't change 1 vote because it doesn't make the votes illegal. Going by his track record it will probably be Trump people that did it. Just like how every instance of voter fraud prosecuted are MAGA losers.

But you don't know the votes aren't illegal though right?

So who cares? Just blindly accept things without chain of custody?

I must say - you would never work out as an auditor.
 
I did. They should all be prosecuted vigorously. None of them show any widespread voter fraud, only isolated idiots. Same with the Trump tards.

Ballot Trafficking operations like the one uncovered nationwide is the very definition of widespread voter fraud.

If that isn't it then nothing is....
 
The ballot traffickers are paid by the ballot delivered. Common sense tells you the more industrious ones are going to create fake ballots in order to make more money.

This is just one leg of it.

Ballot harvesting allows you to strategically remove legal ballots from the final count as well.

This aspect cannot be ignored and marries up real well to a lack of full CHAIN OF CUSTODY.
 
Won't comment on legal merits. But this would have been yugely entertaining if the judge had allowed it.

[tw]1507370337704583172[/tw]
 
That is what I expected.

A "shiny thing" that was so damning that the entire media and big tech colluded to censor it.

That is all confirmed.

Imagine being so programmed to know this fact and still not understand what a pissant you are
 
That is what I expected.

A "shiny thing" that was so damning that the entire media and big tech colluded to censor it.

That is all confirmed.

Imagine being so programmed to know this fact and still not understand what a pissant you are

He literally had the nerve to tell someone else they didn’t know what propaganda was.

I don’t care who he/they were talking to, that lack of self awareness is flat out amazing.
 
[tw]1508446526774943748[/tw]

In direct contrast to the Russia Collusion hoax the more time passes the more evidence comes up that proves that Trump won the 2020 election.
 
[tw]1509849846009761798[/tw]

Wow - Had to go find this super important thread where democracy was at risk but isn't even polling at 1% of an important issue to American voters.

Maybe some real big news would actually benefit the thread.


If you knew the election was stolen as president how far would you go to stop it?

If you knew the election was stolen as the benefitting president how far would you go to stop letting the truth come out?
 
If I was playing poker for real money rather than internet points I would rather have the cell phone of 45's COS as my hand than a private citizens laptop with Rudy and Matt Gaetz's fingerprints all over it.

Just sayin'
 
Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978
The Presidential Records Act (PRA) of 1978, 44 U.S.C. ß2201-2209, governs the official records of Presidents and Vice Presidents that were created or received after January 20, 1981 (i.e., beginning with the Reagan Administration). The PRA changed the legal ownership of the official records of the President from private to public, and established a new statutory structure under which Presidents, and subsequently NARA, must manage the records of their Administrations. The PRA was amended in 2014, which established several new provisions.

Specifically, the PRA:

Establishes public ownership of all Presidential records and defines the term Presidential records.
Requires that Vice-Presidential records be treated in the same way as Presidential records.
Places the responsibility for the custody and management of incumbent Presidential records with the President.
Requires that the President and his staff take all practical steps to file personal records separately from Presidential records.
Allows the incumbent President to dispose of records that no longer have administrative, historical, informational, or evidentiary value, once the views of the Archivist of the United States on the proposed disposal have been obtained in writing.
Establishes in law that any incumbent Presidential records (whether textual or electronic) held on courtesy storage by the Archivist remain in the exclusive legal custody of the President and that any request or order for access to such records must be made to the President, not NARA.
Establishes that Presidential records automatically transfer into the legal custody of the Archivist as soon as the President leaves office.
Establishes a process by which the President may restrict and the public may obtain access to these records after the President leaves office; specifically, the PRA allows for public access to Presidential records through the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) beginning five years after the end of the Administration, but allows the President to invoke as many as six specific restrictions to public access for up to twelve years.
Codifies the process by which former and incumbent Presidents conduct reviews for executive privilege prior to public release of records by NARA (which had formerly been governed by Executive order 13489).
Establishes procedures for Congress, courts, and subsequent Administrations to obtain “special access” to records from NARA that remain closed to the public, following a privilege review period by the former and incumbent Presidents; the procedures governing such special access requests continue to be governed by the relevant provisions of E.O. 13489.
Establishes preservation requirements for official business conducted using non-official electronic messaging accounts: any individual creating Presidential records must not use non-official electronic messaging accounts unless that individual copies an official account as the message is created or forwards a complete copy of the record to an official messaging account. (A similar provision in the Federal Records Act applies to federal agencies.)
Prevents an individual who has been convicted of a crime related to the review, retention, removal, or destruction of records from being given access to any original records.
 
It sure was convenient that Jared Kushner was out of the country on Jan 6. I hope they asked him about that.
 
[tw]1509849846009761798[/tw]

Wow - Had to go find this super important thread where democracy was at risk but isn't even polling at 1% of an important issue to American voters.

Maybe some real big news would actually benefit the thread.


If you knew the election was stolen as president how far would you go to stop it?

If you knew the election was stolen as the benefitting president how far would you go to stop letting the truth come out?

Lol
 
Back
Top