What is your counter to the actual argument, though? The way I’ve looked at the specific issue is similar to what would happen if somehow drugs were magically available on the internet to download. Current possession laws scale up based on how much you have to an extreme level because of the likelihood that the person with more is involved either in production or distribution of the drugs. This is parallel to how child pornography worked in the past. However, you would quickly see that if drugs could be downloaded at little to no cost that you’d have people with cartel-level amounts on hand that had nothing to do with the creation of the drugs. That is closer to the current, awful landscape of child porn now and the laws simply haven’t caught up. The fact that this has been described as mainstream and you have ideological opponents that know the laws and sentencing guidelines sticking their neck out for her makes the whole attack seem crazy to me.
