The Coronavirus, not the beer

[tw]1509282168278687747[/tw]

Yeah - When you setup tests to fail the drugs will show failure.

How many times are you going to amplify this type of dangerous Deza that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of people globally?

Monster
 
That's what my buddy took too and it basically took him for sick to no symptoms in a day

It was basically overnight as well - <24 hours.

Its a miracle drug and hundreds of thousands died because idiots like the lecturer amplified BIg Pharma Deza.
 
[tw]1509282168278687747[/tw]

no difference compared to a placebo

doesn't work

period

This is like when I was arguing with the idiots on here that was saying every election fraud case was republican not knowing it's because the media only reports republican cases and not democrat cases. The media breathlessly posts every Ivermectin study that fails but doesn't mention the studies that show it does work. Once again you fall for media disinformation.
 
This is like when I was arguing with the idiots on here that was saying every election fraud case was republican not knowing it's because the media only reports republican cases and not democrat cases. The media breathlessly posts every Ivermectin study that fails but doesn't mention the studies that show it does work. Once again you fall for media disinformation.

The studies I've seen are uniform. Some show slightly less hospitalizations with ivermectin while others show slightly more. But the key word is slightly, meaning the difference from the placebo is not statistically significant.

There are no studies that show statistically significant efficacy for ivermectin. None. Nada. Zip. Zilch.

In contrast, there is strong statistical evidence for fluvoxamine. Every single study. It is impressive.
 
The studies I've seen are uniform. Some show slightly less hospitalizations with ivermectin while others show slightly more. But the key word is slightly, meaning the difference from the placebo is not statistically significant.

There are no studies that show statistically significant efficacy for ivermectin. None. Nada. Zip. Zilch.

LOL! How little you know.
 
Its a bad look on an issue when BL has to constantly go back to the one thing he believes correct, when the list he got wrong is well.....gargantuan.

Kinda shortsighted IMO.

Even if Ivermectin doesn't do a thing for Covid, it didn't produce near the harmful side effects the vaccine did.
 
Its a bad look on an issue when BL has to constantly go back to the one thing he believes correct, when the list he got wrong is well.....gargantuan.

Kinda shortsighted IMO.

Even if Ivermectin doesn't do a thing for Covid, it didn't produce near the harmful side effects the vaccine did.

He is just a selfish old man that was afraid to go outside.
 
Its a bad look on an issue when BL has to constantly go back to the one thing he believes correct, when the list he got wrong is well.....gargantuan.

Kinda shortsighted IMO.

Even if Ivermectin doesn't do a thing for Covid, it didn't produce near the harmful side effects the vaccine did.

Remember, he was the one that called natural immunity to Covid a crock. Just awful judgment.
 
Back
Top