Now Wimbledon is letting unvaxxed players play again.
The science keeps changing!!
But not if they don't denounce Putin and ignore all the nefarious things the post war rules based international order has done.
Now Wimbledon is letting unvaxxed players play again.
The science keeps changing!!
But not if they don't denounce Putin and ignore all the nefarious things the post war rules based international order has done.
[tw]1509282168278687747[/tw]
[tw]1509282168278687747[/tw]
no difference compared to a placebo
doesn't work
period
I mean the link to the study doesn't work, so how would you know?
DA
In contrast studies of fluvoxamine, a common antidepressant, show high statistical probability of being effective
https://www.forbes.com/sites/robert...25bf0ba5611ec83d53c7df7b55ccc&sh=4e59cc402b58
i continue to be baffled why ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine have attracted enormous cult followings while fluvoxamine flies under the radar.
HCQ saved my father in laws life.
That's what my buddy took too and it basically took him for sick to no symptoms in a day
[tw]1509282168278687747[/tw]
no difference compared to a placebo
doesn't work
period
This is like when I was arguing with the idiots on here that was saying every election fraud case was republican not knowing it's because the media only reports republican cases and not democrat cases. The media breathlessly posts every Ivermectin study that fails but doesn't mention the studies that show it does work. Once again you fall for media disinformation.
The studies I've seen are uniform. Some show slightly less hospitalizations with ivermectin while others show slightly more. But the key word is slightly, meaning the difference from the placebo is not statistically significant.
There are no studies that show statistically significant efficacy for ivermectin. None. Nada. Zip. Zilch.
Not statistically significant does not compute when your motto is " just one life "
Its a bad look on an issue when BL has to constantly go back to the one thing he believes correct, when the list he got wrong is well.....gargantuan.
Kinda shortsighted IMO.
Even if Ivermectin doesn't do a thing for Covid, it didn't produce near the harmful side effects the vaccine did.
Its a bad look on an issue when BL has to constantly go back to the one thing he believes correct, when the list he got wrong is well.....gargantuan.
Kinda shortsighted IMO.
Even if Ivermectin doesn't do a thing for Covid, it didn't produce near the harmful side effects the vaccine did.