First Former President to Have Home Raided by FBI

What did MAGA learn today ?

They learned that in order to unseal a warrant there are these clumsy safeguards.
That protect the rights of the person of interst. In this case ... fill in the blank
As in motions have to be filed and a (the?) judge has to approve
It isn't just " unseal the warrant mf er
Cause we are MAGA and the rule of law doesn't apply to us so,
we never scratch the surface "

To, you know open up the hood to, see how things work
and have worked for better or worse for close to 250 years

here is what happened while MAGA was driving home.
Guess they will whine about that too

https://www.newsweek.com/merrick-ga...=Social&utm_source=Twitter#Echobox=1660250885
 
USA TODAY
@USATODAY
·
1h
"I personally approved the decision to seek a search warrant in this matter,"

said Attorney General Merrick Garland, speaking publicly for the first time

since the FBI searched former President Trump's Mar-a-Lago home.
 

y'all whined for days you wanted to see the warrant and that Garland wasn't involved.
My how events, you now things that happen that matter, evolve
////

bear in mind, this " flunky" had Timothy McVeigh put to death
and didn't blink
 
Last edited:
y'all whined for days you wanted to see the warrant and that Garland wasn't involved.
My how events, you now things that happen that matter, evolve

Lol you think I thought for a second that tyrant garland wasn't involved?

I'm not an idiot

You probably also believe that Biden didn't know about it

Lol the party is so very lucky to have you
 
Duty To Warn ��
@duty2warn
·
3h
The documents seized at Mar-a-Lago “were so sensitive in nature,

and related to national security, that the

Justice Department had to act,” according the NYT.

Trump may be caught in espionage.
 
Lol you think I thought for a second that tyrant garland wasn't involved?

I'm not an idiot

You probably also believe that Biden didn't know about it

Lol the party is so very lucky to have you

a) no
b) keep talking
c) no
d) no, I dont do any of the work
 
Duty To Warn ��
@duty2warn
·
3h
The documents seized at Mar-a-Lago “were so sensitive in nature,

and related to national security, that the

Justice Department had to act,” according the NYT.

Trump may be caught in espionage.

lol. The stupid **** you'll believe.
 
It must have taken a long time to fabricate 14 boxes of evidence. Merrick Garland has clearly been working on this a long time.

The Republican party operates as if whatever one can get away with is fair game and perfectly legal and the MAGA mob is okay with that. Same applies to the FBI.
 
Yeah, just ignore what the FBI has pulled on Trump over the last 5 years. No matter what the FBI gets caught doing you'll excuse it.
 
lol. The stupid **** you'll believe.

c'mon man show us all you made it past 5th grade
you are embarrassing the Rapid Responders


may1
/mā/

1.
expressing possibility.
"that may be true"
2.
expressing permission.
"may I ask a few questions?"
/////
 
c'mon man show us all you made it past 5th grade
you are embarrassing the Rapid Responders


may1
/mā/

1.
expressing possibility.
"that may be true"
2.
expressing permission.
"may I ask a few questions?"
/////

Weren't you bitching about what ifs a couple pages ago?

Have these institutions not lost any credibility in your eyes after the Steele disaster?
 
c'mon man show us all you made it past 5th grade
you are embarrassing the Rapid Responders


may1
/mā/

1.
expressing possibility.
"that may be true"
2.
expressing permission.
"may I ask a few questions?"
/////

"The documents seized at Mar-a-Lago “were so sensitive in nature,

and related to national security, that the

Justice Department had to act,"

The word "may" is on one line about espionage. Do you believe the rest of this statement?
 
Back
Top