Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

cajunrevenge said:
What law was broken.



And Congress passed the Espionage Act, so yes they voted to not only raid but arrest and imprison too.
Click to expand...

He broke the law by mandating masks on air travel.

He broke the law by creating the eviction moratorium

He broke the law by cancelling student debt

I could go on...
 
sturg33 said:
Ask the federal judges who deemed them illegal and thus removed the illegal orders

I don't know why impeachment hasn't begun

Law and order for thee but not for me
Click to expand...



You are taking stupid to new levels. The judge rules them unconstitutional. You are welcome to tell me which Presidents didnt have something ruled unconstitutional. But do go on telling us how not impeaching Biden for something every President has done that none of them were impeached for is inconsistent.
 
Garmel said:
lol

The funny part is that you actually believe that Hillary didn't want it brought to the FBI.

Yeah, I know what Mook said. The problem is that if they tell the media the story the FBI will now know it too. It doesn't make any sense. This was Hillary doing a case of plausible deniability because she and everybody in this effort knew they were committing fraud just like in the Russian Collusion case and didn't want it linked to her.

I laugh when they say they didn't trust the FBI after she just walked away from something that would have put you and me in prison for a long time.
Click to expand...



The funny part is that you think what I think matters. I dont care if you think all these people are lying but you dont get to convict people based on feelings. It requires actual evidence. By your standard you seem to want Trump could be prosecuted for everything false he has ever said about other people because the FBI would hear about it. You fell for a hoax. A sham. A political prosecution. Man up and take the L. Not one person here was ever 10% as convinced of Russian Collusion as you were about this no matter how much you want to rewrite history. But hey, prove me wrong with actual quotes...... unless you got nothing...
 
cajunrevenge said:
The funny part is that you think what I think matters. I dont care if you think all these people are lying but you dont get to convict people based on feelings. It requires actual evidence. By your standard you seem to want Trump could be prosecuted for everything false he has ever said about other people because the FBI would hear about it. You fell for a hoax. A sham. A political prosecution. Man up and take the L. Not one person here was ever 10% as convinced of Russian Collusion as you were about this no matter how much you want to rewrite history. But hey, prove me wrong with actual quotes...... unless you got nothing...
Click to expand...

lol. When the story doesn't make any sense it's not hard to figure out people are lying. The fact is that Durham brought the smoking gun of someone who was an employee of Clinton saying he was a neutral party when he wasn't. Just because Mook said he did this on his own can not be proved and is immaterial anyway. Just because he supposedly did this on his own does not suddenly make him a neutral party because his boss is a rival of the person being looked into. Anywhere else but D.C. (and New York) Sussman would be convicted.

Buying into propaganda is what you do best. You're buying into the document scam.

There were many true believers of the collusion hoax. Go back and do some reading.
 
Last edited:
Aw someone is angry their fake news lied to them. You can cry about it all you want. No jury would have convicted Sussman. The burden of proof is on the prosecutor and he couldnt even produce a lie material to the investigation much less prove beyond a reasonable doubt that it was a lie. I dont see anyone on the left here 1% as angry as you people when the slightest thing doesnt go your way.


BTW I already did go back through the Russia thread and quoted what people said at the time. Thats how I know you cant prove what you say.
 
How about a Congressional Investigation into Trump's abuse of the DOJ?

Let's not forget Individual One. He should do at least double the time his lawyer had to do.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top