Russia Collusion Scandal (aka A Leftist fantasy)

Aggressively confronting Russia by bitching and moaning about sanctions Congress put in place with a veto proof majority and inviting Putin back into the G8. So confrontational he was.
 
Garmel said:
Cool. If that's the case how come the person who did it wasn't charged, huh? If this same scenario happened under Trump you wouldn't be singing this tune. The real world doesn't work this way, bud. If your underling supposedly did this you're held responsible for it. It was her and her campaign's job to notify everyone not to touch anything.
Click to expand...


They werent interested in charging a random nobody. They were out for Hillary. They offered the IT guy immunity in hopes that he would saybHillarybtildnhim to do it. He didnt. It's just weird that you claim people who were out to get a Hillary for political reasons protected her by not charging her with a crime that there isnt even a .0000001% chance she would be convicted of. I get that your are slow but no matter hownkuch you think something to be true, it has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. What you wanted wouldn't have even passed the standards of a civil trial. Why is that sonyarr to understand?
 
Garmel said:
I guess from now on any time someone has their hard drive under subpoena they can just have an employee delete info from it and everyone gets away with it scot-free. The absurdity of this is just mind-blowing.
Click to expand...


Please, show me one case where someone was prosecuted for a crime when someone else admitted to it. Please get your head out of the land of make believe otherwise known as your ass.
 
cajunrevenge said:
They werent interested in charging a random nobody. They were out for Hillary. They offered the IT guy immunity in hopes that he would saybHillarybtildnhim to do it. He didnt. It's just weird that you claim people who were out to get a Hillary for political reasons protected her by not charging her with a crime that there isnt even a .0000001% chance she would be convicted of. I get that your are slow but no matter hownkuch you think something to be true, it has to be proven beyond a reasonable doubt in a court of law. What you wanted wouldn't have even passed the standards of a civil trial. Why is that sonyarr to understand?
Click to expand...

Oh, so they're not interested in charging a nobody. lol. He broke the law so why wasn't he punished? Oh, I forgot. Nobodies don't get charged. Keep digging deeper, bud.

Lay off the dope.
 
Prosecuting him didnt further the goal of getting Trump elected. With as dumb as your arguments are maybe you should try some dope, it cant possibly make you dumber.
 
I wonder why he was offered immunity. Hmm. Oh, yeah he broke the law. Nobodies don't go to jail so it's all for naught.

I can't believe the utter BS that I'm hearing.

I guess he was responsible for her having an illegal server set up too so that's why she walked from that as well.
 
Last edited:
cajunrevenge said:
Which law did having a private email server break exactly?
Click to expand...

Let me answer that with your response. You're so doped up that you can't remember what you say from day to day. Contradiction after contradiction after contradiction from you.

You are correct here in the bolded part.

cajunrevenge said:
Theres no real comparison between Hillary and Trump if we are being honest. Her emails are digital whereas Trump had physical documents. What was classified in Hillarys emails was classified AFTER they were on her server. She and her lawyers never lied under oath that they didnt have documents that the FBI later found easily in a search. The FBI also tried desperately to charge her with deleting her subpoenad emails. They even gave the IT guy immunity in hopes he would say Hillary told him to do it. I dont blame you if you are skeptical of the IT guys story, so am I, but it wasnt a winnable case for prosecutors. Also the way they destroyed her government hard drives/phones is consistent with policy. I have done IT work for the government and we had to destroy all hard drives. We used a drill. My issue with her server was that it was a roundabout way to avoid FOIA requests which should be criminal.
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
Durham trial not going well. Durham spent hours arguing and trying to impeach his own witness who testified that the defendant was truthful to the FBI. Is he trying to speed run an exoneration? Let's see if the jury beats the 7 hours to suit from the Sussman hoax.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Durham trial not going well. Durham spent hours arguing and trying to impeach his own witness who testified that the defendant was truthful to the FBI. Is he trying to speed run an exoneration? Let's see if the jury beats the 7 hours to suit from the Sussman hoax.
Click to expand...

As I said before the trial is meaningless. What comes out of it has already been meaningful.
 
cajunrevenge said:
These goalposts are going over the speed limit they are moving so fast.
Click to expand...

I said it awhile back. Getting him on some Mickey Mouse charge which probably won't happen in DC anyway isn't as important as finding out that the FBI used the uncollaborated dossier to get warrants.
 
cajunrevenge said:
I wish dodging FOIA was a crime. Anyways, about that law you say she broke, you can list it anytime now.
Click to expand...

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...government-rules-watchdog-finds-idUSKCN0YG21Z

You can't do these things in secret, dip****. You need approval. The reason they have this is so people can't skirt FOIA requests by keeping secret servers.

You already know that I'm sure. You made a fool of yourself once again because you can't remember **** from day to next because you're doped up.
 
Last edited:
Oh **** guys she broke government rules. This guys over here talking about government rules. Not a law. Government rules..... lol. I never figured you for a comedian but son of a bitch you got me. Haven't laughed that hard in a while. Today I learned people can be prosecuted for breaking government rules. Trump better watch out.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Oh **** guys she broke government rules. This guys over here talking about government rules. Not a law. Government rules..... lol. I never figured you for a comedian but son of a bitch you got me. Haven't laughed that hard in a while. Today I learned people can be prosecuted for breaking government rules. Trump better watch out.
Click to expand...

So, you're not prosecuted for breaking government rules now. Interesting.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top