Sad Dénouement of l'Affaire Durham

At least some Russians have rejected the Kremlin's deza. You otoh keep parroting in and pull out the victim card when ithis is pointed out.

[Tw]1620043578956447745[/tw]
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
I never thought you were a bot thethe. But you are definitely Vlad's boy. Anything new on the Ukrainian bioweapons labs?
Click to expand...

There were documented biolabs close to the border of Russia.

Are you denying that? Of course not.
 
Nice article that shows the issues with the NY Times piece. Way too many unnamed sources for instance and basically an unethical hit job from the NYT.

[tw]1620095014587207682[/tw]
 
Garmel said:
Nice article that shows the issues with the NY Times piece. Way too many unnamed sources for instance and basically an unethical hit job from the NYT.

[tw]1620095014587207682[/tw]
Click to expand...

They have to come up with a hit piece for their idiot readers. They have blood on their hands pushing the hoax in the first place.
 
Garmel said:
Nice article that shows the issues with the NY Times piece. Way too many unnamed sources for instance and basically an unethical hit job from the NYT.

[tw]1620095014587207682[/tw]
Click to expand...

We knew that simply bc BL posted it. Didn’t even need to read his deza.
 
Almost 7 years later and they are still falling for Russian Collusion hoaxes.

WHERE IS THE PROOF OF THE HACK?
 
You are one to talk Charlie Brown. Remer when you thought you owned me because Durham indicted someone..... only for them to be exonerated.....
 
cajunrevenge said:
You are one to talk Charlie Brown. Remer when you thought you owned me because Durham indicted someone..... only for them to be exonerated.....
Click to expand...

Sure thing bud - Trump indictment incoming!

Russian Loans!!!

You get things hysterically wrong beyond a reasonable doubt because your hoaxes actually get fully investigated.
 
cajunrevenge said:
You are one to talk Charlie Brown. Remer when you thought you owned me because Durham indicted someone..... only for them to be exonerated.....
Click to expand...

Exonerated despite evidence showing them to be guilty. Immaterial you say? https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/poli...mitted-he-was-representing-clinton/ar-AAXuUtz

"Durham has repeatedly argued that Sussmann’s alleged lie to Baker was “material” and that it mattered. Sussmann’s team argued he didn’t lie and that even if he had, it was immaterial. Baker’s testimony would seem to hurt the defendant’s arguments"

Anybody with a working brain knows if this wasn't held in DC Sussmann would have been found guilty.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
Exonerated despite evidence showing them to be guilty.
Click to expand...
Jury disagreed. And the judge hinted rather strongly he would have set aside a guilty verdict. Jury foreman indicated it wasn't a close case and basically a waste of time. Deliberations did not take long. Could be they were all wrong and you are right. Could be you are wrong.
 
nsacpi said:
Jury disagreed. And the judge hinted rather strongly he would have set aside a guilty verdict. Jury foreman indicated it wasn't a close case and basically a waste of time. Deliberations did not take long. Could be they were all wrong and you are right. Could be you are wrong.
Click to expand...

DC, baby. If it was someone who worked for Trump instead of Clinton do you think he walks? Don't be naïve.

He lied and Durham showed the paperwork to prove it.

Same place where you go to jail for trespassing after being invited in and seditious conspiracy for tough guy talk while doing nothing.
 
Last edited:
Two of Durham's prosecutors quit on him because they knew he was abusing his prosecutorial discretion. His actions call out for appointment of an independent investigator. They are the actions of a politically tainted prosecutor trying to use the legal system for partisan political purposes by persecuting innocent Americans. Hopefully the new House Committee on politicization of law enforcement looks into it too. It is a shocking abuse of the legal system. Only sickos and pedophiles would approve of such behavior.
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
Two of Durham's prosecutors quit on him because they knew he was abusing his prosecutorial discretion. His actions call out for appointment of an independent investigator. They are the actions of a politically tainted prosecutor trying to use the legal system for partisan political purposes by persecuting innocent Americans. Hopefully the new House Committee on politicization of law enforcement looks into it too. It is a shocking abuse of the legal system. Only sickos and pedophiles would approve of such behavior.
Click to expand...

Sure, bud. Sure.
 
Durham was looking into the Alfa bank scandal and FBI malfeasance during this time and actually finds a gold mine. So much prosecutorial misconduct!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top