Another Example of Juror Bias in DC

Anyhow it will be an interesting case to follow as the gentleman avails himself of the right to appeal
 
The people in the middle (both democrats and republicans) have to make a decision if they want the US to exist in the future. If you want a free country then it’s clear what party you should vote for regardless of the candidate at the top of the ticket.

The rationale of wealthy people in secluded white low crime areas (BL) are irrelevant moving forward.
 
nsacpi said:
that's not been wo(R)king too well...turns out candidate quality matters
Click to expand...

Yeah we’ve definitely seen that with studs like Biden and fetterman.

As I’ve said. People in the middle need to make a final choice. We don’t have much longer.
 
Garmel said:
Your story doesn't hold, lecturer.

[tw]1644478246870736896[/tw]
Click to expand...

He had his forensics experts and the prosecution had theirs. That's how it works. It's an adversarial process and the people best qualified to make the decision are the ones in the courthouse. Not always perfect. And we all at various times will object to a verdict. Y'all though might want to reconsider this unseemly sympathy for the criminal class of America.

If the jury is wrong, surely there are some judges left in Texas who are not part of the woke commie mob. Surely, he will get a fair shake from one of them.
 
nsacpi said:
He had his forensics experts and the prosecution had theirs. That's how it works. It's an adversarial process and the people best qualified to make the decision are the ones in the courthouse. Not always perfect. And we all at various times will object to a verdict. Y'all though might want to reconsider this unseemly sympathy for the criminal class of America.

If the jury is wrong, surely there are some judges left in Texas who are not part of the woke commie mob. Surely, he will get a fair shake from one of them.
Click to expand...

The picture there shows the weapon being pointed at the driver.
 
“Shooting after creating an event where you have to shoot, is not a good shoot.”  – Perry’s friend Michael Holcomb, warning him two weeks before the shooting

Should have listened to his friend.
 
nsacpi said:
what can i say...DC jury

hopefully there are some good judges left in texas who will give him a fair hearing upon appeal
Click to expand...

If it turns out that this case gets overturned via appeals, do you point to that as evidence that our system is healthy?
 
sturg33 said:
If it turns out that this case gets overturned via appeals, do you point to that as evidence that our system is healthy?
Click to expand...

No one case is going to say much about the health of our legal system.

I do find it interesting how all of a sudden a substantial part of the right wants to defund the FBI and cast doubt about the legitimacy of the entire legal system. It says something. But not about the health of the legal system.

We have a whole group of people now who want to get their way regardless of law. They want to disenfranchise voters who disagree with them. And they don't like the law being applied to them.
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
No one case is going to say much about the health of our legal system.

I do find it interesting how all of a sudden a substantial part of the right wants to defund the FBI and cast doubt about the legitimacy of the entire legal system. It says something. And not about the health of the legal system.

We have a whole group of people now who want to get their way regardless of law. They want to disenfranchise voters who disagree with them. And they don't like the law being applied to them.
Click to expand...

Ok you didn't answer the question but you continue to suggest that a wrongful verdict is no big deal because our system has an appeals process that can correct things

My position is that the verdict being incorrect is a sign of bad health. And the disease will keep spreading as idiots like you keep supporting it.

And one day the appeals process will be just as ill.
 
sturg33 said:
Ok you didn't answer the question but you continue to suggest that a wrongful verdict is no big deal because our system has an appeals process that can correct things

My position is that the verdict being incorrect is a sign of bad health. And the disease will keep spreading as idiots like you keep supporting it.

And one day the appeals process will be just as ill.
Click to expand...

There have been verdicts I disagree with. The system is not perfect. But no legal system will be perfect. If your boy gets convicted in New York, Washington or Atlanta, it will be because he is a career criminal and the law will have finally caught up with him. Not because of the unfairness of it all.
 
sturg33 said:
Ok you didn't answer the question but you continue to suggest that a wrongful verdict is no big deal because our system has an appeals process that can correct things

My position is that the verdict being incorrect is a sign of bad health. And the disease will keep spreading as idiots like you keep supporting it.

And one day the appeals process will be just as ill.
Click to expand...

This reminds me of when Biden continuously passes or makes EOs that are blatantly unconstitutional. In some cases, our system fixes that disease. And we all breathe a sigh of relief that we are healthy. But there is never any punishment... And it just emboldens them to keep going. Best case is it sticks... Worst case is we get 12 months of illegal policy, and a **** ton of money must be spent to solve.

But that disease is spreading, and it's not long before the cancer is curable
 
nsacpi said:
There have been verdicts I disagree with. The system is not perfect. But no legal system will be perfect. If your boy gets convicted in New York, Washington or Atlanta, it will be because he is a career criminal and the law will have finally caught up with him. Not because of the unfairness of it all.
Click to expand...

1. If the law decides he's guilty and will find the crime to prove it, that's very bad

2. If the law decides that Trump's crimes matters but Bidens don't, that's a huge problem.

You're basically begging for a civil war
 
sturg33 said:
1. If the law decides he's guilty and will find the crime to prove it, that's very bad

2. If the law decides that Trump's crimes matters but Bidens don't, that's a huge problem.

You're basically begging for a civil war
Click to expand...

Not really. But carry on with the equivalence.
 
sturg33 said:
This reminds me of when Biden continuously passes or makes EOs that are blatantly unconstitutional. In some cases, our system fixes that disease. And we all breathe a sigh of relief that we are healthy. But there is never any punishment... And it just emboldens them to keep going. Best case is it sticks... Worst case is we get 12 months of illegal policy, and a **** ton of money must be spent to solve.

But that disease is spreading, and it's not long before the cancer is curable
Click to expand...


This is just weird that you started this all of a sudden. Every President would be in prison based on this standard that you just made up out of nowhere. Based on your logic shouldnt every prosecutor and elected official who passes/enforced abortion laws that were unconstitutional for the last 50 years and we both know will be as soon as Republicans dont have a majority on the Supreme Court go to prison?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top