2024 Field

There are a couple things... RDS is actually smart. He will use ever legal tactical advantage he can in every single state. He is on record explaining how each state election rules are different, so his teams will be dedicated to understanding how they can exploit them to the fullest extent... for example - funding a massive ballot harvesting campaign in Nevada, whereas Trump said he already won Nevada twice so no need to make any adjustments.

Secondly, RDS can actually build coalitions... Brian Kemp doesn't despise him so he is likely to turn GA back red. Glenn Younkin doesn't despise him so he may be able to turn VA back red. etc etc... Trump build no coalitions... he has few allies remaining

What I know about Trump is he is adamant that he does not need to make any changes because he has already won. And the $250M he raised to impact election integrity has been lit on fire.

Are you clear on what the courts ruled? If so, how would Desantis and his team get past that? Just saying RDS is smart and is talking about how states setup their elections (as if this is a new discovery) doesn't answer the question.

When the courts say he has no standing before the election and then afterwards throw out cases not on the merit but procedural issues that don't actually speak to the facts of the case what is the response? How about the fact that a proper dispute of an election would take well over a year to follow through on and the elections are 'cemented' on a few months after?
 
You're going to have to pick a lane here.

CNN is pushing a strong Trump narrative. Is that them succumbing to reality or are they pushing an agenda?

The 'narrative' is a fact based assessment on readily available data. Otherwise, nobody would be saying these things.
 
Yes when I accurately summarized your position but may have gotten the time wrong... and you focus on that and claim I lied

zito-esque semantics arguing is boring.

But it is reassuring to know you demand specifics from sturg33 but not from Steve Bannon

I don't demand specifics from you. I'm asking you to be consistent and not change your claim mid-argument. Is that too much to ask?
 
Maybe you can explain to me why the GOP tried to change the way California allocates their primary electoral votes?
 
"Uniparty/Establishment forces will not let Trump win!" - Admission that Trump actually won in 2020 but is not serving and the same will happen in 2024.

Therefore Sturg is firmly in the corner of giving them exactly what they want. Hmm......

I hate to tell you this but Trump is the establishment.

Paul Ryan
Rona McDaniel
Mitch McConnel
Kevin McCarthy
Anthony Fauci
General Milley
Christopher Wray
Mitt Romney
John Bolton


every single one of them earned Trump's endorsement. If you claim "HE DIDN'T KNOW" but thethe and stung did, that is unacceptable
 
I hate to tell you this but Trump is the establishment.

Paul Ryan
Rona McDaniel
Mitch McConnel
Kevin McCarthy
Anthony Fauci
General Milley
Christopher Wray
Mitt Romney
John Bolton


every single one of them earned Trump's endorsement. If you claim "HE DIDN'T KNOW" but thethe and stung did, that is unacceptable

"Trump is the establishment" during a time where its clear the establishment on both sides are doing everything possible to ensure he does not win the election.

Amazing logic.
 
The 'narrative' is a fact based assessment on readily available data. Otherwise, nobody would be saying these things.

Great so if CNN were pushing RDS has the true threat to Biden, you wouldn't be pointing to it and saying " SEE!? THE MSM ESTABLISHMENT IS TRYING TO UNDERMINE TRUMP YET AGAIN!!!"
 
"Trump is the establishment" during a time where its clear the establishment on both sides are doing everything possible to ensure he does not win the election.

Amazing logic.

His record is his record. Why is he so stupid to elevate and endure the people trying to destroy him?
 
I'm not totally familiar with the rule change but at first glance it would appear to help Trump, no?

No - The original attempt to split them proportionally as opposed to winner take all like it always was.

Then Laura Loomer got on the case and blew it up so now they had to go back to a system that more closely resembled what it always was.
 
His record is his record. Why is he so stupid to elevate and endure the people trying to destroy him?

He was stupid and he was naive to do so but there was a reason and a rationale one at that early on to do so despite your revisionist history.

Now he and his team knows and it will be a completely different animal which is why the establishment on both sides is desperate to do whatever they can (including the CAGOP attempted change) to ensure he doesn't win again.
 
Great so if CNN were pushing RDS has the true threat to Biden, you wouldn't be pointing to it and saying " SEE!? THE MSM ESTABLISHMENT IS TRYING TO UNDERMINE TRUMP YET AGAIN!!!"

Oh I think RDS has a shot to beat Biden in a general. He would just have to fire his entire campaign team who designed this attack 'Trump supporters' mentality. There is a reason RDS popularity has plummeted.
 
No - The original attempt to split them proportionally as opposed to winner take all like it always was.

Then Laura Loomer got on the case and blew it up so now they had to go back to a system that more closely resembled what it always was.

From what I can tell it let's him avoid the state altogether and come away with way more delegates. And according to this article, his campaigned pushed for the rule change
https://www.latimes.com/politics/st...tes-trump-desantis-presidential-election-2024


So to answer your question I'd say the California GOP changed their rules to help Trump
 
From what I can tell it let's him avoid the state altogether and come away with way more delegates. And according to this article, his campaigned pushed for the rule change
https://www.latimes.com/politics/st...tes-trump-desantis-presidential-election-2024


So to answer your question I'd say the California GOP changed their rules to help Trump

Yes - you are looking at what is now being done AFTER an attempt to split the vote proportionally which is not consistent with how they did it in the past.

Its ok that you aren't following these things but I'm jsut telling you the story whether you want to believe it or not.
 
He was stupid and he was naive to do so but there was a reason and a rationale one at that early on to do so despite your revisionist history.

Now he and his team knows and it will be a completely different animal which is why the establishment on both sides is desperate to do whatever they can (including the CAGOP attempted change) to ensure he doesn't win again.

Fool me once...

His judgement of personnel is abysmal.

In 2016, he campaigned on draining the swamp but all he did was keep filling it.

It is what it is. You can say he's learned and now he will be really good. But I've never heard him once express that he has made mistakes, have you?
 
Yes - you are looking at what is now being done AFTER an attempt to split the vote proportionally which is not consistent with how they did it in the past.

Its ok that you aren't following these things but I'm jsut telling you the story whether you want to believe it or not.

Again the article says it is done... not in the process of being changed.

GOP establishment propping up establishment Trump... sad to see
 
Again the article says it is done... not in the process of being changed.

GOP establishment propping up establishment Trump... sad to see

You are being deliberately obtuse. A month + ago they were trying to change it to proportional share. Only after they were outed by loomer did they move to this because it was obvious what the original intention was.

So again we get to the same question. Are you a fraud or stupid?
 
You are being deliberately obtuse. A month + ago they were trying to change it to proportional share. Only after they were outed by loomer did they move to this because it was obvious what the original intention was.

So again we get to the same question. Are you a fraud or stupid?

Walk me through the timeline here.

What were the rules in 2020

What did they try to change it to that psycho Laura Loomer supposedly saved

And what is it now?
 
Walk me through the timeline here.

What were the rules in 2020

What did they try to change it to that psycho Laura Loomer supposedly saved

And what is it now?

I’m supposed to do this work for you when I gave you the roadmap? Stop it and use google and you will see that my timeline is 100% accurate. If I’m wrong then out me. Otherwise, stop saying things you have no clue about.
 
Back
Top