Trump Indictment Watch

thethe said:
“If memory serves”

Fitting
Click to expand...

Pence took contemporaneous notes. It is a throwaway phrase, probably indicating that at that moment his memory wasn't exactly sure what day he was asked to throw the election. But the ask itself was obviously a memorable one, as it would be for anyone. "I want you to set aside the election results." That was the ask. And your boy is gonna do time for it.
 
Last edited:
nsacpi said:
Pence took contemporaneous notes. It is a throwaway phrase, probably indicating that at that moment his memory wasn't exactly sure what day he was asked to throw the election. But the ask itself was obviously a memorable one, as it would be for anyone. "I would like you to set aside the election results." That was the ask. And your boy is gonna do time for it.
Click to expand...

Go run with this evidence. Just like when Schiff said “more than circumstantial evidence”

This is the strategy. Blitz the media narratives with lies and then when the truth comes out the world as moved on.

Trump will do zero time for this and the sooner you wrap your warped mind around that the sooner you’ll get over the inevitable outcome we are barreling towards.
 
nsacpi said:
I guess Pence forged those notes he took as well. Good luck to you and your boy.
Click to expand...

Oh you think even if those notes exist trump is going to do time for words on a sheet of paper from one person? Your understanding of the justice system is amusing.
 
Just remember trumps team plan to fix a stolen election was so illegal that they had to “reinforce” the existing langauage to prevent anyone from trying to again.

And they don’t think these fact patterns won’t shred them in the SC.
 
thethe said:
It wasn’t proved like I always told you.

But at least you’re using “if” now.
Click to expand...


I am asking do you think its illegal and/or bad if Trump asked Pence to just reject electoral votes. You take issue with Pence saying it so that implies you think it would be bad/illegal if true.
 
cajunrevenge said:
I am asking do you think its illegal and/or bad if Trump asked Pence to just reject electoral votes. You take issue with Pence saying it so that implies you think it would be bad/illegal if true.
Click to expand...

No because what he was asking him to do (demand to states for additional inspection) was legal and justifiable. Pence can frame it any way he wants but “the plan” was discussed for at least a month prior to the election because it was telegraphed was would happen.
 
thethe said:
It wasn’t proved like I always told you.

But at least you’re using “if” now.
Click to expand...


Who is disputing it wasnt proven? Its been proven Trump asked Russia for help. He did it on live TV. Its been proven Don Jr attended a meeting with Russians who promised dirt on Hillary. Theres a whole bunch of smoke regarding Trump and Russia. Not necessarily colluding for help in the election. Its probably Russia propping up Trump via helping him secure loans through Duetsche Bank long before he was even President. He went to Russia in the 80's at the invitation of a Russian diplomat/spy and came back and started his campaign of trashing America. I believe it was old Ronnie and Japan he was railing against back then. Theres a whole lot of smoke regarding Trump and Russia. Far more than there is Joe Biden took a bribe. But you think theres plenty of evidence of one of these two things.
 
thethe said:
No because what he was asking him to do (demand to states for additional inspection) was legal and justifiable. Pence can frame it any way he wants but “the plan” was discussed for at least a month prior to the election because it was telegraphed was would happen.
Click to expand...


That wasnt the question sir. I didnt ask you if it happened. I am asking you do you think Trump telling Pence to just reject electoral votes is bad, illegal, or both. I get that your nervous to answer the question because that sets a goal post and you dont know whats coming down the pike.
 
thethe said:
Just remember trumps team plan to fix a stolen election was so illegal that they had to “reinforce” the existing langauage to prevent anyone from trying to again.

And they don’t think these fact patterns won’t shred them in the SC.
Click to expand...


The only person who thought it was legal/constitutional doesnt even have a law degree.
 
thethe said:
Oh you think even if those notes exist trump is going to do time for words on a sheet of paper from one person? Your understanding of the justice system is amusing.
Click to expand...


You really think thats all the evidence. Tell me now before we know who is a cooperating witness. Which people in Trumps team are RINO globalists who cant be trusted and who are the honest ones. I am not going to let you wait until you find out who is cooperating to use the same tired excuse you always use. Tell us now. They all have long records so you should be able to tell us now.
 
cajunrevenge said:
Who is disputing it wasnt proven? Its been proven Trump asked Russia for help. He did it on live TV. Its been proven Don Jr attended a meeting with Russians who promised dirt on Hillary. Theres a whole bunch of smoke regarding Trump and Russia. Not necessarily colluding for help in the election. Its probably Russia propping up Trump via helping him secure loans through Duetsche Bank long before he was even President. He went to Russia in the 80's at the invitation of a Russian diplomat/spy and came back and started his campaign of trashing America. I believe it was old Ronnie and Japan he was railing against back then. Theres a whole lot of smoke regarding Trump and Russia. Far more than there is Joe Biden took a bribe. But you think theres plenty of evidence of one of these two things.
Click to expand...

I’m aware of the remaining bull**** you continue to hang onto.
 
cajunrevenge said:
That wasnt the question sir. I didnt ask you if it happened. I am asking you do you think Trump telling Pence to just reject electoral votes is bad, illegal, or both. I get that your nervous to answer the question because that sets a goal post and you dont know whats coming down the pike.
Click to expand...

No because it was the last constitutional remedy to stop a stolen election. It also didn’t mean that pence says a word and trump is president like you’re pretending.
 
thethe said:
No because it was the last constitutional remedy to stop a stolen election. It also didn’t mean that pence says a word and trump is president like you’re pretending.
Click to expand...


"[T]hey [the Electors in each state] shall sign and certify [the lists of persons receiving votes for President and Vice President], and transmit [the lists] sealed to the seat of Government of the United States, directed to the President of the Senate [i.e., the Vice President]; — The President of the Senate shall, in the presence of the Senate and the House of Representatives, open all the certificates, and the votes shall then be counted;"


Show me where in the constitution it says the VP can do what Trump wanted. The plan was to create a legal issue and hope a Conservative majority in the Supreme Court would be corrupt enough to shred the constitution in their favor. Then to use the insurrection Act to put down the ensuing riots/protests. Most likely wouldnt have worked although you could always count on Corrupt Clarence Thomas to vote for it. You think the states can decertify electors after certifying them but no states did so. There was no legal or logical basis for sending it back to the states even if that was an option. It was all about trying to delay the Congressional certification so they could try to find a way to subvert the results.
 
thethe said:
I’m aware of the remaining bull**** you continue to hang onto.
Click to expand...


Why wont you tell us who the RINO globalists in Trumps inner circle are before we find out who is a cooperating witness? They all have long records. You cant wait until its revealed they are witnesses against Trump to use your... at this point..... signature excuse.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top