2024 Field

Garmel said:
Yes, many people changed their minds when Barr said there wasn't any but we now know Barr didn't investigate anything. So, you've now changed your mind on fraud because RDS said so? I thought more of you. I hope RDS doesn't do a 180 on vaccines because you'll follow that **** too I guess.
Click to expand...

what does what i posted have anything to do with my position?

you asked for a person on Trump's staff that believes he lost the election.

I provided that to you. He said so, under oath of purgury.

Why is that not a deal breaker to the cult, like RDS' answer supposedly is?
 
sturg33 said:
what does what i posted have anything to do with my position?

you asked for a person on Trump's staff that believes he lost the election.

I provided that to you. He said so, under oath of purgury.

Why is that not a deal breaker to the cult, like RDS' answer supposedly is?
Click to expand...

Okay. Looks like I misunderstood your position on fraud. Why does anybody care about Miller's thoughts? RDS' opinion is much more important than his. I'm surprised Trump allowed him back. Perhaps when he found out Barr lied about investigating 2020 he changed his opinion.
 
Once again, challenging an election is not against the rules, libs. I know you've been conned into believing that but it isn't true.
 
Garmel said:
Once again, challenging an election is not against the rules.
Click to expand...
True. He was well within his rights to bring legal challenges. Unfortunately, the courts were not buying any of his claims of fraud. He should have left it there.
 
Garmel said:
Okay. Looks like I misunderstood your position on fraud. Why does anybody care about Miller's thoughts? RDS' opinion is much more important than his. I'm surprised Trump allowed him back. Perhaps when he found out Barr lied about investigating 2020 he changed his opinion.
Click to expand...

This exchange started when I was surprised that a cult member decided answering that question was enough to offset the "two years of his life he owes RDS"

I pointed out Trumps own team has gone well beyond that.

You asked for an example.

I gave you Miller

You then pivoted to sharing your disappointment in me
 
nsacpi said:
True. He was well within his rights to bring legal challenges. Unfortunately, the courts were not buying any of his claims of fraud. He should have left it there.
Click to expand...

You are allowed to have alternate electors. The dems have used them for years and nobody cared. There are several legal scholars who have said what Trump did was legal.
 
sturg33 said:
You asked for an example.

I gave you Miller

You then pivoted to sharing your disappointment in me
Click to expand...


Why should Miller's thoughts mean anything? You're acting like you found the Holy Grail or something. His opinion doesn't mean much. Like I said he was basing his opinion because Barr said so. We now know Barr did nothing.

I said if you buy into fair elections because RDS said so I would be disappointed.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
Why should Miller's thoughts mean anything? You're acting like you found the Holy Grail or something. His opinion doesn't mean much. Like I said he was basing his opinion because Barr said so. We now know Barr did nothing.

I said if you buy into fair elections because RDS said so I would be disappointed.
Click to expand...

Lol do you not remember you asking me for an example of someone on Trumps staff saying that he lost the election?

Miller matters because he was the answer to your question
 
sturg33 said:
Lol do you not remember you asking me for an example of someone on Trumps staff saying that he lost the election?

Miller matters because he was the answer to your question
Click to expand...

"By the way, Trump 2020 campaign manager and 2024 senior advisor said under oath that they know he lost, and that they used it for fundraising.

What's your thoughts on that?"

You thought you found something earth shattering so that's why I asked. You also say here that he said "that they know he lost, and that they used it for fundraising." He said that he thought there wasn't enough fraud to change the election which is a lot different from what you're saying here.
 
Last edited:
Garmel said:
"By the way, Trump 2020 campaign manager and 2024 senior advisor said under oath that they know he lost, and that they used it for fundraising.

What's your thoughts on that?"

I asked because you thought you found something earth shattering.
Click to expand...

I've no idea why I have spent this much time on this topic...

But I posted that because catturd and thethe were very upset about RDS acknowledging Trump lost the election... and so I was surprised that they are so forgiving when trumps very own staff says the same thing (of course I'm not actually surprised)

This shouldn't be difficult to follow
 
sturg33 said:
I've no idea why I have spent this much time on this topic...

But I posted that because catturd and thethe were very upset about RDS acknowledging Trump lost the election... and so I was surprised that they are so forgiving when trumps very own staff says the same thing (of course I'm not actually surprised)

This shouldn't be difficult to follow
Click to expand...

As I said it's because his opinion doesn't mean much just as I said earlier. I answered your question.
 
Garmel said:
That's what I'm asking. Who in the current staff could say this and keep their job? Maybe an ex-employee but not a current one. Have you checked this or are you going by what RDS said? This isn't in Trump's nature.
Click to expand...

Then why did you bother posing this question if you simply planned to dismiss the answer
 
sturg33 said:
Then why did you bother posing this question if you simply planned to dismiss the answer
Click to expand...

I dismissed it because the premise you created was ridiculous. You tried to create some kind of equality between what Miller thought and what RDS thought. You know, a presidential contender vs a dude in the Trump campaign. Btw, I'm willing to bet Miller doesn't believe what he said earlier now that we know Barr lied about investigating.
 
Garmel said:
I dismissed it because the premise you created was ridiculous. You tried to create some kind of equality between what Miller thought and what RDS thought. You know, a presidential contender vs a dude in the Trump campaign. Btw, I'm willing to bet Miller doesn't believe what he said earlier now that we know Barr lied about investigating.
Click to expand...

All RDS is guilty of is answering a question truthfully, of which you yourself agreed.

But the cult hates the truth and so they are crying about it
 
Garmel said:
Yes, many people changed their minds when Barr said there wasn't any but we now know Barr didn't investigate anything. So, you've now changed your mind on fraud because RDS said so and a Trump official said so? I thought more of you. I hope RDS doesn't do a 180 on vaccines because you'll follow that **** too I guess.
Click to expand...
If RDS changed his opinion on vaccines to be the same as Donald Trump, that would qualify as a “180 on vaccines”.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top