I dont know why the influencers simply dont open the binders and read it. They could be the ones to expose it all!The Epstein binder photo op will never not be funny
Completely invalidates the entire MAGA grifter sphere in one picture
Their assigned talking points, probably.I really do wanna know what was in that binder ol Draino posed with
Or ask Karoline Leavitt back when she was doing those cute little Q&As st the white house with the MAGA griftersdid any of the influencers open up the binders and ask "why is this empty?"
Or ask Karoline Leavitt back when she was doing those cute little Q&As st the white house with the MAGA grifters
Its intended to get the word out that your party is on the verge of killing the most important city in the world
This isn’t intended as an endorsement of Mamdani’s suggestion, but who exactly is the target audience of this tweet? Maybe these idiots would be more effective if they pointed out the reasons that seizing luxury condos won’t help the housing crisis instead of trying to persuade the one person on planet Earth that owns multiple speculative luxury properties in New York City and is undecided on their vote in the Mayoral race. These grifters have this really weird habit of pushing talking points for the ultra rich as if it’s a direct attack on the average Joe, when there are actual reasons that such policies might not deliver the intended consequences.
wtf
This isn’t intended as an endorsement of Mamdani’s suggestion, but who exactly is the target audience of this tweet? Maybe these idiots would be more effective if they pointed out the reasons that seizing luxury condos won’t help the housing crisis instead of trying to persuade the one person on planet Earth that owns multiple speculative luxury properties in New York City and is undecided on their vote in the Mayoral race. These grifters have this really weird habit of pushing talking points for the ultra rich as if it’s a direct attack on the average Joe, when there are actual reasons that such policies might not deliver the intended consequences.
Setting aside whether the policy is a good one, please feel free to let me know who you think the “you” is in her tweet that would be having their property seized, and if you think it’s the common man.
Why on earth does that matter?Setting aside whether the policy is a good one, please feel free to let me know who you think the “you” is in her tweet that would be having their property seized, and if you think it’s the common man.
It doesn’t matter, I just found it emblematic of a messaging approach on the right that confuses me. There’s a broad strategy of tying anything the left does to some rich and/or powerful person to everybody else in a way I don’t understand. This idea that if you let the Dems tax the rich or prosecute Trump for something or any other number of things that they’re coming for you next, when the “you” in question is average Americans that are absolutely in no danger of any of these things happening to them. I just find it odd, because it doesn’t seem like it should be an effective strategy.Why on earth does that matter?
The leading contender to lead the largest city on earth is seriously proposing seizing property from citizens
Two things.It doesn’t matter, I just found it emblematic of a messaging approach on the right that confuses me. There’s a broad strategy of tying anything the left does to some rich and/or powerful person to everybody else in a way I don’t understand. This idea that if you let the Dems tax the rich or prosecute Trump for something or any other number of things that they’re coming for you next, when the “you” in question is average Americans that are absolutely in no danger of any of these things happening to them. I just find it odd, because it doesn’t seem like it should be an effective strategy.
I know class warfare is all the rage but it’s actually an insane thing for essentially the incoming mayor to support seizing private property.
This isn’t intended as an endorsement of Mamdani’s suggestion, but who exactly is the target audience of this tweet? Maybe these idiots would be more effective if they pointed out the reasons that seizing luxury condos won’t help the housing crisis instead of trying to persuade the one person on planet Earth that owns multiple speculative luxury properties in New York City and is undecided on their vote in the Mayoral race. These grifters have this really weird habit of pushing talking points for the ultra rich as if it’s a direct attack on the average Joe, when there are actual reasons that such policies might not deliver the intended consequences.