Global Events & Politics Überthread

All of these people will be sent home eventually. The west doesn’t have the stomach for it yet but the next generation of the yute will make it right.
 
So where are the Charlie Kirk people who said murder is wrong when Trumps dropping bombs on boats with no due process. Explain to me how one is morally wrong but the other was not morally wrong. To be clear I did not say how is one legal. I know people clutch their pearls when I say sometimes violence is justified because they have been programmed to have a specific response but you all agree violence is sometimes necessary and justified. All your freedoms and rights came because men picked up a gun to murder other men.


Heres a quick question to prove my point. When exactly did it become morally justified to assassinate Hitler. If someone Charlie Kirk'd him in 1939 he would be remembered as a great leader and a man of peace.
 
zitothebrave said:
Japan has a collapsing population. Maybe the way to do things is to figure out who to bring in to increase your population.
Click to expand...

I think this will work itself out. Populations will shrink and conditions will present themselves where people have more kids. The fallacy we need African migrants to help population collapse is exactly what the globalists want people to believe.
 
thethe said:
I think this will work itself out. Populations will shrink and conditions will present themselves where people have more kids. The fallacy we need African migrants to help population collapse is exactly what the globalists want people to believe.
Click to expand...
The problem is that it isn't that simple, you need people to run the work force.

I'm not saying people need immigrants or don't. But Japan is on the bubble of full population collapse. Last year they had the lowest births in the country since 1968 while while nearly 3 times that died. You want a bit of balance for resource draining, but Japan's average age is like 46

The reason for the population decline is many fold, but primarily it's because of most people needing 2 income households, but also generally speaking, poor people have more kids than rich people. Because rich people see their kids as an investment, poor people see them as future help.
 
zitothebrave said:
The problem is that it isn't that simple, you need people to run the work force.

I'm not saying people need immigrants or don't. But Japan is on the bubble of full population collapse. Last year they had the lowest births in the country since 1968 while while nearly 3 times that died. You want a bit of balance for resource draining, but Japan's average age is like 46

The reason for the population decline is many fold, but primarily it's because of most people needing 2 income households, but also generally speaking, poor people have more kids than rich people. Because rich people see their kids as an investment, poor people see them as future help.
Click to expand...
I just think its cyclical and while all the things you mentioned above are true (ignoring the AI/Robotics will fille the gap) these things just work itself out. It may take 50-100 years but birth rates will go back up eventually.
 
thethe said:
I just think its cyclical and while all the things you mentioned above are true (ignoring the AI/Robotics will fille the gap) these things just work itself out. It may take 50-100 years but birth rates will go back up eventually.
Click to expand...
They won't if AI/Robotics negate the workforce.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top