That’s a lot of fluff.See: “Race is a stupid social construct that obscures more than it clarifies.”
I’m concerned with actual outcomes.
That’s a lot of fluff.See: “Race is a stupid social construct that obscures more than it clarifies.”
I’d think a self proclaimed data guy would want good data, not a load of nonsense. There’s nothing essential about race, so injecting it into your data set is only going to obscure.
Nobody should be give more opportunity because of race. Talk about a strawman here.To be clear on your position, SCOTUS was wrong to overturn affirmative action because race IS essential and we should consider individuals based on arbitrary group characteristics.
Race is either essential or it isn’t. If we’re going to punish people for their immutable characteristics, why wouldn’t we similarly give them a boost? They can’t help it, after all.Nobody should be give more opportunity because of race. Talk about a strawman here.
You keep living in your imaginary world where tribes don't display similar characteristics.
Race is either essential or it isn’t. If we’re going to punish people for their immutable characteristics, why wouldn’t we similarly give them a boost? They can’t help it, after all.
What a delusional person you areMy goal is to ensure the streets are safe for my citizens. As usual you revert to theoretical arguments that aren't applicable in real world situations.
Whatever information is useful to keep law abiding citizens safe is good information to have.
The largest racial group receiving SNAP benefits is White, making up about 35.4% of recipients, followed by African Americans at 25.7%, and Hispanic individuals at 15.6%. However, other groups, such as Black, American Indian, and Alaska Native households, are more likely to rely on SNAP benefits relative to their population size. A significant portion of participants (17%) are listed with an unknown race, according to USDA data.Is BLM stepping in to help out their community with SNAP benefits loss ?
42M disabled children?the community of disabled peoples or children ?
cut em off,huh ?
I have no problem supporting needy children or disabled.
Have a nice day and good luck.
I have lived long enough to know we are all merely a bad break away
God forbid you find your self in that pickle
because as i noted above i have no qualms using taxes funding your would be crutch
Sad you don't share that sentiment
oh, and to set the record straight , we agree "race of recipients makes on bit of difference to me"
Im happy to engage you here, but before I do. Are there ANY limitations to SNAP program that 57 would support? If so, what would that look like. What would need to be for you to say "cut that person off"geez, what happened in 2020 ?
i would appreciate you provide a link explaining that 42M
and you question, my "standards of compency "
those questions are still standinggeez, what happened in 2020 ?
i would appreciate you provide a link explaining that 42M
and you question, my "standards of compency "
Asking someone what their limiting principle is isn’t the equivalent of “jumping through a MAGA hoop.” If anything, they’re similarly guilty of not having a limiting principle on their own policies.I dont or wont jump through your MAGA hoops
go find someone else