UNCBlue012
Well-known member
How are the Mets still predicted to have a good offensive output? lmao
How are the Mets still predicted to have a good offensive output? lmao
Lindor and Soto.How are the Mets still predicted to have a good offensive output? lmao
Two players make them a top-four offensive squad? I get the correlation doesn't quite work that way, but that's a stretch imoLindor and Soto.
The projections system they are using has all of their players still on the team producing more oWAR than last year except for Lindor and Soto.How are the Mets still predicted to have a good offensive output? lmao
That's strange because Carroll's carrying tool was contact and Kiley describes Burress such that he seems like a free swinger.Drew Burress seems to get a lot of Corbin Carroll comps. I could get on board with that. Doesn't hurt that he is from our backyard too.
I think it's mostly because he's short, plays CF (though not sure if he can stay there ), and has a good amount of power and speed.That's strange because Carroll's carrying tool was contact and Kiley describes Burress such that he seems like a free swinger.
If we draft him he will shoot up to the best LHP prospect in the game and destroy his elbow after his first MLB appearance only to never be the same again.I don't love the idea of a HS pitcher at 9, but here's some video of Rojas last night. He's a stud.
Yeah, that at 9 is a steal.I don't love the idea of a HS pitcher at 9, but here's some video of Rojas last night. He's a stud.
Just based on his name—the most important metric—he reminds me of Drew Waters and Josh Burrus. VETO.