Search results

You said yourself we are in a post Constitutional period. There’s no sense having this conversation.

Stop with the constant moralization. I don’t need you to adjudicate my motives. It’s either Constitutional or it’s not. You’re welcome to debate me on those grounds.

You’re proving Glenn and Justin’s point. This mindset is how we got the Patriot Act.

Trump fixed the disorderly entry. Good job Trump. All I ask is he respect the Constitution.

Glenn is a libertarian?

66% of your base has stock exposure. Some of them may not mind. Some of them will mind quite a bit. How much of your base can you afford to piss off?

Do you own stock?

I’m just glad Bessent has taken control of the wheel and the message has shifted from E.R.S. It was nonsense from the beginning.

Not at all. I’m saying the concept of the External Revenue Service replacing income tax is no longer the plan.

Well unfortunately with last week’s software patch, the messaging has shifted to trade deals with rest of the world to isolate China so we will no longer be financing the external revenue service.

Certainly a good thing to have less government spending (unfortunately didn’t happen) and lower income tax. Unlike your point of increasing domestic production (which is a good thing), neither of those have anything to do with making Americans pay a consumption tax

Yup. Certainly a good thing to have more domestic production. It just means everyone will pay a consumption tax to have that.

Certainly Nissan will get the memo soon that customers don’t pay tariffs

Then stop trolling

In 2 months if PS5 goes up in price it means tariffs are paid by consumers.

I know you want to refer to tweets how PS5’s haven’t gone up in price (yet). But it’s clear in the data that firms front ran tariffs in Q1 to hold off price increases.