No clue who Nick Fuentes is
[tw]1497471734609584128[/tw]
This is a pretty quick way to explain exactly who Nick Fuentes is.
No clue who Nick Fuentes is
Have someone run against her t with her policies and ill support them. Until then policy is everything.
You know what’s ironic? Your bff Sturg comes in and rails on people about being racist and homophobic with zero rationale and no receipts. 12 hours later you openly defend an anti semite by justifying it with a lack of opponent. Lol y’all keep openly laying your hypocrisy everywhere through this board.
It's about time for Greene to take a hike. This and the space lasers **** she believes in is just too over the top.
https://reason.com/2022/03/10/libertarian-candidate-faces-uphill-ballot-battle-to-challenge-marjorie-taylor-greene/
After finding herself unable to support either Donald Trump or Hillary Clinton for president in 2016, Angela Pence (no relation to the former vice president) started looking outside the confines of either Republican or Democratic politics. That led her to the Libertarian Party (L.P.). In 2020, she started volunteering for Jo Jorgensen's campaign and serving as political director for the Georgia L.P.
For the 2022 election cycle, Pence decided to throw her own hat into the ring, by running against Republican Marjorie Taylor Greene in the race to represent Georgia's 14th Congressional District in the House of Representatives. Greene, in just a single term, has garnered a reputation as a kook, spreading outlandish conspiracy theories ranging from defending QAnon, to suggesting that California wildfires were intentionally caused by lasers from outer space. Just last month, Greene appeared as a speaker at a white nationalist political conference. There would seem to be plenty of room for a competitor.
But before someone like Pence can make her case to voters, she has to clear another hurdle: Georgia's ballot access laws.
Georgia's laws are quite onerous: To qualify for the ballot in a race for a districted position, a candidate needs to collect the signatures of 5 percent of all registered voters in their district—for the U.S. House, that means between 20,000 and 25,000 signatures. Conveniently, the two major parties are exempt from this rule, by virtue of having been on the ballot previously.
The law was initially passed in 1943, at a time when the state was also barring Communists from running for office. Perhaps not surprisingly, since 1943, not one single third-party candidate has made it onto the ballot for a districted race in Georgia. Last year, on a challenge from the Georgia L.P., a district court tossed the 5-percent rule, replacing it with a rule only requiring signatures from one-percent of registered voters. But earlier this year, the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals reinstated the requirement.
——————
Get out your pen, Jaw!
It’s ridiculous…one of the few things (D) and (R) agree on is do whatever they can to preserve their duopoly.
I see thier point and agree with them to an extent. These third party candidates have no shot of winning so you are wasting a vote, by voting for one of them. Local elections it’s fine, but presidential elections should only have two options.
Ten years from now I think people will be consistently choosing between 3-4 presidential candidates.
I hope so because the two we have right now suck. There’s a reason why fewer and fewer people are identifying with them each year.
Ten years from now I think people will be consistently choosing between 3-4 presidential candidates.
And that’s how the republicans will lose every election.
Justin Amash
@justinamash
·
13h
No member of Congress—no person—can read, understand, and analyze 2,741 pages and $1.5 trillion in spending in just a few hours. Voting for such a thing is beyond irresponsible. To do so is to place your political ambitions above your responsibility to the people you represent.