119th Congress or Red Wave In Adult Land

Garmel said:
Deace's point is ridiculous. Just because you rid yourself of an incompetent idiot and the person who replaces him isn't up to par either doesn't mean the first firing wasn't justified.
Click to expand...

They didn't have a plan and more importantly they didn't have the numbers to pull such a stunt.

The lack of strategic focus and competence from the MAGA wing continues to produce nothing but failure
 
sturg33 said:
They didn't have a plan and more importantly they didn't have the numbers to pull such a stunt.

The lack of strategic focus and competence from the MAGA wing continues to produce nothing but failure
Click to expand...

You're willing to defend one of the biggest RINOs in congress who quit the team after losing his job in order to get some kind of "gotcha" on MAGA.

Holy ****, man.
 
Garmel said:
You're willing to defend one of the biggest RINOs in congress who quit the team after losing his job in order to get some kind of "gotcha" on MAGA.

Holy ****, man.
Click to expand...

Lol. No I'm willing to admit that what Gaetz did was a total stunt, with no plan, and it has resulted in nothing but a negative.

For **** sake the dude voted for Scalise as his replacement!
 
The GOP will never be able to make any meaningful impact until they win some ****ing elections.

Pathetic

[Tw]1744371473937052088[/tw]
 
The plan was getting rid of one of the worst problems in congress. No, there was not a definite plan afterwards but it's not like you can get any worse than what you had.

I guarantee you if Johnson gets demoted he won't quit the team. I think he'll be better in the long run.
 
sturg33 said:
The GOP will never be able to make any meaningful impact until they win some ****ing elections.

Pathetic

[Tw]1744371473937052088[/tw]
Click to expand...

That was a problem under McCarthy. Most of the republicans blamed him and Mitch, not Trump for the '22 elections.
 
Garmel said:
The plan was getting rid of one of the worst problems in congress. No, there was not a definite plan afterwards but it's not like you can get any worse than what you had.

I guarantee you if Johnson gets demoted he won't quit the team. I think he'll be better in the long run.
Click to expand...

If that were the plan why did he endorse an objectively WORSE candidate after?
 
Garmel said:
That was a problem under McCarthy. Most of the republicans blamed him and Mitch, not Trump for the '22 elections.
Click to expand...

Why were GOP elections a problem under McCarthy, specifically? He was a mega fundraiser... so what was he doing to actively hurt them?
 
sturg33 said:
Why were GOP elections a problem under McCarthy, specifically? He was a mega fundraiser... so what was he doing to actively hurt them?
Click to expand...

Because he's responsible for the House. He sabotaged MAGA candidates and gave his buddies money they didn't need in sure races. The same stuff Mitch does. He didn't push early voting either.
 
sturg33 said:
If that were the plan why did he endorse an objectively WORSE candidate after?
Click to expand...

Scalise is a RINO but a much more honest decent person. After McCarthy's quitting stunt that assures me they did the right thing by canning him. No integrity whatsoever.
 
Garmel said:
Scalise is a RINO but a much more honest decent person. After McCarthy's quitting stunt that assures me they did the right thing by canning him. No integrity whatsoever.
Click to expand...

The party is weaker today than it was 3 months ago.

And the new guy is the same as the last guy
 
she is Palestinian and by definition, a Semite.
Still has family in Gaza.
In that light ...
her stances are understandable.
Not necesarily agreeable but, understandable
She gotta dog in the fight
 
I would say same if it was a Jewish person portrayed

I think both sides are wrong , and have been wrong for ages
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top