chop2chip
Well-known member
And who picked Cody Johnson in 2006?
The same guy who picked Heyward and Freeman the next season.
No one is saying that Clark batted a 1.000, but he definitely was superior to successor.
And who picked Cody Johnson in 2006?
So the good picks were by Roy Clark and the bad ones by JS?
The same guy who picked Heyward and Freeman the next season.
No one is saying that Clark batted a 1.000, but he definitely was superior to successor.
I would be curious if we compared the drafts from 2008 - 2014 vs the 2001 - 2007 from just a WAR perspective... I have no idea how bad it would be.
I suppose 07 is going to trump everything bc of Heyward and Freeman. Plus it's tough to compare bc obviously the first list would have had more time to accumulate.
Nevermind - bad idea
You mean Roy Clark the powerhouse? That man knows not what a bad pick is
Actually it is a good idea.
Roy Clark is one of the most respected scouting directors in history. It says something that 3/4 of the picks you attributed to Wren's supposed draft wizardry were all attributed to him and they weren't even his best successes.
Let's also not forget that the Braves almost never went over slot during his tenure because of budget constraints.
I'll be glad to do a comparative analysis. But before I do that I need to know which were the Roy Clark drafts and which were the Frank Wren drafts. Can someone help me with that?
Sure.
Roy Clark left in 2009 and Frank Wren put his own guy in after that.
Do we want to look at the Braves draft history from 2010-2014 and compare it to Clark's?
Anyone know who was running the draft in 2005. To me the Joey Devine pick was as bad as the Gilmartin pick.
Anyone know who was running the draft in 2005. To me the Joey Devine pick was as bad as the Gilmartin pick.
That's why you don't draft for need in the MLB draft.
Clark isn't perfect, but I prefer him to DeMacio. Any scouting director is captive to the pursestrings, so that has to be part of the calculation.
Which were the Roy Clark drafts?
Not in my opinion. The Devine pick actually made some sense to me. And Devine likely is a very good closer if he didn't blow his arm out. I don't mind finding a future closer in the first round if they are a pretty good bet to be an effective closer.
Not in my opinion. The Devine pick actually made some sense to me. And Devine likely is a very good closer if he didn't blow his arm out. I don't mind finding a future closer in the first round if they are a pretty good bet to be an effective closer.
Anyone have any analysis, specific or general, for today's selections heretofore? Any crystal-ball insights, [MENTION=54]50PoundHead[/MENTION]?
You know you can google this stuff for yourself. It's not that opaque.
2000-2009
For extra credit purposes, he was with Nationals from 2009-2011 (check out which players the Nats drafted in those years). He was with the Dodgers from 2012-2014 and you'll enjoy the list of players drafted in his tenure in Los Angeles as well.
Philosophically, I think you want to draft with upside in mind with your first round pick. For me that rules out someone who projects as a reliever, even a good closer.