It seems to only be a problem throwing to 1st. I would think he'd be fine throwing home. Heck, he could just throw a normal pitch.
I don't really have an issue hitting Montero for Ross. Just isn't a big deal to me. But, use Schwarber at some point.
Eh, the Indians would have the advantage with Kluber on the mound for Game 7.
True, however, the Cubs confidence would be real high if they can force a Game 7. Confidence goes a long way in a championship series.
True, however, the Cubs confidence would be real high if they can force a Game 7. Confidence goes a long way in a championship series.
in that situation, clutchness, grit, maturity and veteran leadership are the keys.I would still rather have the pitching advantage than more confidence.
When it all boils down to one game, a bad hop or a gust of wind can change everything. You really want to avoid that.
Cleveland gets to use Kluber one more time, which in itself is a bigger advantage than the Cubs.
Anyone named Kluber must have great grit.
Right... They might even get an Infield Fly.![]()
One bad call is all it takes.
When it all boils down to one game, a bad hop or a gust of wind can change everything. You really want to avoid that.
yup, only takes one fan interfering with a catch..
The guy doing the FG chat summed up perfectly why I think the Braves managed by Cox did so poorly in the playoffs:
schwoch
1:01 Curious to know what Maddon does strategically that bothers you most. I'm a 56-year-old lifelong Cubs fan so I've seen some really bad managers; often when I disagree with Maddon strategically I find out later there was some factor I didn't know (like Lester basically taking himself out the other night).
august ***erstrom
1:02 I don't watch the Cubs every day, so it's entirely possible I'm overreacting, but in the past, I get the sense that he's sometimes a bit passive when I'd prefer him to be more aggressive. That being said, a lot of that likely has to do with keeping players happy, and he has a reputation as being maybe the best player's-manager in the game, so maybe this balances out!
1:03 At this stage in the game, though, I think the sliders might have to shift more towards tacticianal aggression and less towards the keeping-players-content argument, which seems better suited for the 162-game grind than the seven-game win-or-go-home series
I also don't know jack **** about managing, so I'm probably way off base.
His latest passive move that bothered me was not getting Schwarber an AB in the 4th inning on Sunday. He should have hit for Heyward, Baez or Ross. Francona manages aggresively in the postseason, while Maddon is still trying to keep guys happy. I think it is a big reason the Indians are doing so well against a far superior team.
Maddon did finally use Chapman aggressively in game 5 though, and it probably won them the game.
I don't watch Maddon that much, but I've always seen him as oddly aggressive at points and burning off his bench early in the game. But again, I haven't watched him that closely. One thing he does that bugs me a bit is that he moves guys around willy-nilly throughout the game, often for no apparent reason. He does have a solid squad that can do that somewhat seamlessly, but sometimes it looks like he's just trying to screw around for the sake of screwing around. For my part, I think all managers are pretty much equal except for the really bad ones. To me, there's about a micron difference between those in the upper quartile. It usually boils down to management of the pitching staff and clubhouse atmosphere.