2016 Presidential Primaries [ SUPER TUESDAY | 3-1-'16]

Scott Walker Strips Wisconsin Workers Of 'Living Wage' In New State Budget
Posted: 07/13/2015 10:02 pm EDT Updated: 53 minutes ago

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) signed the new state budget into law on Sunday with a last-minute change that strips the words "living wage" from state laws and replaces it with "minimum wage."

The change means minimum-wage Wisconsin workers will earn nearly $6,000 per year less than what the Massachusetts Institute of Technology calculates is a living wage in the state. And they will have no recourse, according to the Center for American Progress. MIT says a living wage would be $10.13 an hour.

The new law eliminates the ability of low-wage workers to appeal for a living wage. Previously, Wisconsin law stated that employee pay "shall be not less than a living wage," defined as "adequate to permit any employee to maintain herself or himself in minimum comfort, decency, physical and moral well-being." Wisconsin's living wage was tied to the state minimum wage, currently $7.25 an hour.

The old law allowed residents to challenge the living wage amount with the Department of Workforce Development. Last year, 100 workers, most earning just above the minimum wage, did just that, contending their pay wasn't a living wage. The state denied their claim, declaring "there is no reasonable cause to believe that the wages paid to the complainants are not a living wage." The workers later filed a lawsuit against the state.

Walker, who announced his 2016 presidential campaign on Monday, also decided workers don't need weekends off. According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the budget Walker signed "would allow factory and retail employees to work seven days without a day off, as long as they said in writing that they were doing so voluntarily." The old law required employers to give workers at least one day off for every seven days of work.
 
goldfly pokes at others for their website choices, but then copies something from Huffington Post. That's rich.

Fortunately, there's a balance here (even in the NYT): http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/13/u...scott-walker-signs-wisconsin-budget.html?_r=0

In the end, Mr. Walker avoided raising sales and income taxes. He cut spending in the University of Wisconsin system by $250 million, and continued a freeze on in-state tuition. And the budget he signed permits an expansion of the state’s voucher program for students to go to private schools

The state’s final budget includes a repeal of the state’s prevailing wage laws, which set prices for public construction contracts and are generally supported by labor unions. The matter had been debated at length for months, then added to the budget in the final weeks.

Mr. Walker has made a national name for himself by sharply limiting collective bargaining rights to most public sector workers in 2011, and this year he signed a law barring companies from requiring workers to pay the equivalent of union dues.
 
Scott Walker Strips Wisconsin Workers Of 'Living Wage' In New State Budget
Posted: 07/13/2015 10:02 pm EDT Updated: 53 minutes ago

Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker (R) signed the new state budget into law on Sunday with a last-minute change that strips the words "living wage" from state laws and replaces it with "minimum wage."

The change means minimum-wage Wisconsin workers will earn nearly $6,000 per year less than what the Massachusetts Institute of Technology calculates is a living wage in the state. And they will have no recourse, according to the Center for American Progress. MIT says a living wage would be $10.13 an hour.

The new law eliminates the ability of low-wage workers to appeal for a living wage. Previously, Wisconsin law stated that employee pay "shall be not less than a living wage," defined as "adequate to permit any employee to maintain herself or himself in minimum comfort, decency, physical and moral well-being." Wisconsin's living wage was tied to the state minimum wage, currently $7.25 an hour.

The old law allowed residents to challenge the living wage amount with the Department of Workforce Development. Last year, 100 workers, most earning just above the minimum wage, did just that, contending their pay wasn't a living wage. The state denied their claim, declaring "there is no reasonable cause to believe that the wages paid to the complainants are not a living wage." The workers later filed a lawsuit against the state.

Walker, who announced his 2016 presidential campaign on Monday, also decided workers don't need weekends off. According to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, the budget Walker signed "would allow factory and retail employees to work seven days without a day off, as long as they said in writing that they were doing so voluntarily." The old law required employers to give workers at least one day off for every seven days of work.

Goldy mad about voluntary work.
 
ah, the truth ---

how does that old saw go about scoundrels and truth ?
or statistics

or views
I forget
......

If one eats the cake does not one also have the cake?
 
goldfly pokes at others for their website choices, but then copies something from Huffington Post. That's rich.

i really don't go to the huffington post often at all

but are you saying huffington post and poorrichardsnews.com are on the same playing field?
 
The politicians - it doesn't really matter. The nation needs to implode anyway. Scratch that - needs to continue to implode.

And that is the world you see we are supposed to be saving fetus' for?
Pretty dreadful outlook from my point of view.
 
Can't have your cake and eat it too.

never understood that phrase

if i am getting a cake, i am going to eat it

thankfully, people aren't refusing to make cakes for heterosexuals yet so i know i can get that cake made for me
 
The politicians - it doesn't really matter. The nation needs to implode anyway. Scratch that - needs to continue to implode.

seriously

at what point wasn't it imploding then?

i mean, it's founded on genocide and when we finished that we then enslaved humans to build an economy.

after that, we fought over the right to own other humans and then the side that lost did everything they could to make sure that they stayed 2nd class citizens

so, i am curious where it wasn't imploding and when it was ever godly?
 
i really don't go to the huffington post often at all

but are you saying huffington post and poorrichardsnews.com are on the same playing field?

That other site is a blog (just like HuffPo) -- at least it's honest about it.
 
That other site is a blog (just like HuffPo) -- at least it's honest about it.

well, i don't see how you could compare them since obviously huffington post is more than just a blog.

it's the lefts version (i guess) of drudge report and drudge isn't a blog.

poorrichardsnews seems like the "tea party news network" that a few "friends" share on facebook
 
well, i don't see how you could compare them since obviously huffington post is more than just a blog.

it's the lefts version (i guess) of drudge report and drudge isn't a blog.

poorrichardsnews seems like the "tea party news network" that a few "friends" share on facebook

Drudge Report is a blog. So is Breitbart. So is Huffington Post. So is Slate.

They aren't news outlets. They don't send credentialed reporters out in the field.

They aggregate articles and post opinion pieces, ergo blog.
 
seriously

at what point wasn't it imploding then?

i mean, it's founded on genocide and when we finished that we then enslaved humans to build an economy.

after that, we fought over the right to own other humans and then the side that lost did everything they could to make sure that they stayed 2nd class citizens

so, i am curious where it wasn't imploding and when it was ever godly?

Who said it was ever godly? You evidently don't know that I think the Tory position was the correct one. That said, things can and are worse but of course you probably don't think so because we work out of different world views.
 
Back
Top