striker42
Well-known member
So will next year be a super good result with two 1st round picks?
The bad result is losing a draft spot and a year of development.
So will next year be a super good result with two 1st round picks?
The bad result is losing a draft spot and a year of development.
So the Braves lost $4.9 million off this year's bonus pool...but they don't have to write a $4.9 million check to anyone either.
Any chance this could go into the fund for upgrades at the trade deadline?
Also heard a great conspiracy theory judge for yourself....
If the Braves sign a big-ticket free agent next year, they will lose either their second or third-highest draft pick, depending on a couple of benchmarks. A top 10 pick cannot be touched no matter who you sign. The Braves could rationalize that they stole a No. 1 pick in Jenista, and most assess this draft as overall pretty strong. But even if the Braves sign TWO big $$$ free agents next year, they will still have No. 9 instead of a long, long wait to make any kind of pick.
The last part will be negated if the pick in 2019 is spent on a college hitter, which the sheer volume of hitting prospects might indicate.
Also heard a great conspiracy theory judge for yourself....
If the Braves sign a big-ticket free agent next year, they will lose either their second or third-highest draft pick, depending on a couple of benchmarks. A top 10 pick cannot be touched no matter who you sign. The Braves could rationalize that they stole a No. 1 pick in Jenista, and most assess this draft as overall pretty strong. But even if the Braves sign TWO big $$$ free agents next year, they will still have No. 9 instead of a long, long wait to make any kind of pick.
The bad result is losing a draft spot and a year of development.
So instead of having a player from the top of a strong draft already in the system for a complete season, they would prefer to have a top pick later?
Let’s call that logic...unsound.
Stewart was injured and they didn’t know until after the draft. It’s really that simple.
1 draft spot at the back end of the top 10 doesn't really matter. A year of development can easily be negated by picking a college player if they are the BPA.
One spot in the top 10 can be a huge difference. It's not always but there are plenty of times where the guy a team really wants goes one pick earlier.
And you're gambling that a college player will be the BPA. Another thing not guaranteed.
Ultimately, there are a dozen ways we could be hurt by this. Maybe it turns out okay or even better but this is not something teams want to do.
One spot in the top 10 can be a huge difference. It's not always but there are plenty of times where the guy a team really wants goes one pick earlier.
And you're gambling that a college player will be the BPA. Another thing not guaranteed.
Ultimately, there are a dozen ways we could be hurt by this. Maybe it turns out okay or even better but this is not something teams want to do.
So instead of having a player from the top of a strong draft already in the system for a complete season, they would prefer to have a top pick later?
Let’s call that logic...unsound.
Stewart was injured and they didn’t know until after the draft. It’s really that simple.
This has always been the most likely true. But it's also the most boring (the truth is usually boring).
My personal conspiracy theory is that the Braves wanted to sign Stewart way under slot so they could use the money to sign other picks (Hess). To do this they looked for the first hint of injuy they could find, his wrist, and tried to use it as an excuse to offer him way less. They probably thought an 18 year old kid would jump at 2-3 million rather than take a chance on the draft again. They were wrong.
However, the Braves decided that it would be better in the long run to stick to their guns. If they blinked now then agents would know they would blink in the future. So they felt it was better to miss out on Stewart and take the 9th pick next year.
This fits with AAs letting picks walk in Toronto.
But this is still unlikely. It's just more fun than the truth.
So instead of having a player from the top of a strong draft already in the system for a complete season, they would prefer to have a top pick later?
Let’s call that logic...unsound.
Stewart was injured and they didn’t know until after the draft. It’s really that simple.
One spot in the top 10 can be a huge difference. It's not always but there are plenty of times where the guy a team really wants goes one pick earlier.
And you're gambling that a college player will be the BPA. Another thing not guaranteed.
Ultimately, there are a dozen ways we could be hurt by this. Maybe it turns out okay or even better but this is not something teams want to do.
You realize all this hand-wringing is beyond useless, right?
They haven't the slightest clue who (or what) will be available at #9 next June - and certainly aren't making plans based on who they think that player might be. All these theories (not just yours) are pretty laughable. You've seen how much draft boards change in the span of a couple weeks when May rolls around every year - thinking that they've got ANY particular target in mind 11 months ahead of the next draft is nuts.
They picked a kid at #8 with a lot of upside WITHOUT the knowledge that he was hiding an injury. Thankfully the medical staff caught it and warned them that it was a bigger issue than they originally thought. They offered enough money to make sure they got a replacement pick in case things didn't work out (and would have been perfectly happy to sign him if he'd take it), but not so much that they'd have simply been throwing that money away if the injury caused the kid to flame out completely and Stewart passed. This is one of those times when things really are what they seem.
I hope it works out for him, I honestly do. There's no way I'd have passed - if the injury isn't serious, I'd eventually get that couple million back in a few years when I got to the bigs. If he goes to JuCo and something happens (whether related to this particular injury or not), he just *issed away seriously life-changing money.
The discussion grew out of grading the draft, something that's fairly useless in and of itself.
Who knows what happens next year. My only point is that drafting a guy at 8 who ends up not signing is a very bad result. Dropping to 9 next year combined with all kinds of uncertainty is not good.
If Stewart was healthy and signed, the draft was an A+. With Stewart not signing it drops to an F in my mind.