2020 Field

Should he win the nomination he will be running against someone being tried for campaign finance violations in connection to affair with a porn star.
I see where that is a thing in NYC today.
As opposed to policy differences

Speaking of Venezuela read earlier today that Eric Prince is collecting money and men for an excursion onto the SOuth American continent.
Assuming due to a tax credit, holding brown children indefinatly sometimes losing brown children , something something about a nod/wink to ninth month abortion nonsense you and the other bubble boi are ok with that.

Guess my point is, the (R) house is a ****ing disaster right now and it is tacky under any circumstances for (R) telling (D) who should and shouldn't be their nominee

Because end of the day --- you still got Trump
or Gary Johnson

Perhaps you should focus on your nominee
 
What did any of that even mean?

Your candidates support socialism. Socialism is what is happening in venezuela.
 
Talking Points Memo
‏Verified account @TPM
29m29 minutes ago

Judge Refuses To Toss Congressional Dems’ Emoluments Suit Against Trump
 
Are the same people who obsess over each Trump lie also going to do the same for the Dems?

This is just a lie

[TW]1123044549318848512[/TW]
 
Paul Ryan's exampled secretary received $1.15 per week. Works out to what ? $70 a year
That isn't a tax cut that is a FU
 
D5cWxU8XkAEZMwf.png

Talking Points Memo
‏Verified account @TPM
16m16 minutes ago

An activist with ALS urges Congress to support Medicare for All: "GoFundMe is a terrible substitute for smart congressional action" http://bit.ly/2UMNxjL
 
.
and the janitor that cleans the rest room where you work --- that you are fond of dismissing --- wonder what his tax relief was,
ask him tomorrow

then tell him how good he has it
report back
 
57Brave said:
.
and the janitor that cleans the rest room where you work --- that you are fond of dismissing --- wonder what his tax relief was,
ask him tomorrow

then tell him how good he has it
report back
Click to expand...

Present your conclusion with data and facts and I'll take you seriously.

Otherwise, please continue to be willfully stupid and and a joke
 
The founders weren't stupid

[TW]1123315252555214848[/TW]

These days, the American dream is more apt to be realized in South America, in places such as Ecuador, Venezuela and Argentina, where incomes are actually more equal today than they are in the land of Horatio Alger. Who’s the banana republic now?

- Bernie
Click to expand...
 
the data and facts are Paul Ryan celebrated the tax cut by shining a light on a Pa secretary that got a $1.70 a week tax cut.

From where I sit that was more the rule than the exception

What was Trump's tax cut last year ?

Data and facts --- you are a hoot
..............

Next piece of data and fact is my federal tax burden was virtually the same.
Maybe varied a dollar or two

and you, ... yours was what, 79% something something something
...........................

do you understand how data is used in a scientific context?
you wouldn't recognize a fact if it ...
 
Last edited:
57Brave said:
the data and facts are Paul Ryan celebrated the tax cut by shining a light on a Pa secretary that got a $1.70 a week tax cut.

From where I sit that was more the rule than the exception

What was Trump's tax cut last year ?

Data and facts --- you are a hoot
..............

Next piece of data and fact is my federal tax burden was virtually the same.
Maybe varied a dollar or two
Click to expand...

You are using an anecdote like you always do.

Why do you willfully run away from objective facts?

I, for example, saw my tax bill go down by $3,900 last year.

So in your world, I can extrapolate my experience to every single American, right?

We had this argument at the time. You can read the damn tax rate changes. They were reduced by ~3% pretty much across the board.

The only people who didn't see a substantial tax cut are:

1.) people who don't pay taxes

2.) Rich people with expensive houses
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top