2020 Field
- Thread starter sturg33
- Start date
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I am not voting for either but I would rather Biden who would listen to the experts as opposed to Trump who thinks he is the expert.
acesfull86
Well-known member
Biden would listen, but might not remember what he heard after 3 minutes passed
Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
This is probably true but I think (hope) he would appoint actual science experts to key positions like Obama did. Even though Obama wasn't my fave either he wasn't afraid to put smart and experienced people in important positions rather than filling them with "yes men".
Who Biden picks in his cabinet is probably going to be much better than Trump and his "acting" cabinet
.
.
goldfly
<B>if my thought dreams could be seen</B>
lol
monster?
he has his cult.
but monster?
just under 6 million on twitter
twitter audit has him rated well for real followers at 5.5
anyway, the likes of Bieber, Katy Perry, Rihanna, taylor swift etc are "monster followings"
the lowest number in followers for that list is 85 million lol
he's ranked 745 in followers on twitter
right between: Perez Hilton and Rana Daggubati
also Willyrex is a spanish youtube thats 2 spots ABOVE Joe for followers on twitter.
lol
Last edited:
Metaphysicist
Not Actually Brian Hunter
The cabinet statement is so weird. Appointing a good cabinet is the single most important thing a President does.
Do you believe that Buden isnt suffering from early dementia?
Why dont you guy by cumulative views on his podcasts?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I dont know who Biden would name to head the EPA but I bet he wouldnt want or need a 43,00 dollar sound proof telephone booth like Scott Pruitt who Trump appointed. I dont care what side your on, thats some shady ****.
zitothebrave
Connoisseur of Minors
They should ditch the old coot. How the democrats had 4 years and their only plan was to keep Bernie from nomination is baffling. It's stunning they couldn't find one semi-attractive party candidate.
Oklahomahawk
Boras' Client
Well to be fair Tulsi was at least semi-attractive don't you think? Oh you were talking about politics....my bad
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
They fell into the trap of thinking name recognition equals electability. It means nothing in the general election because just being the nominee comes with a huge boost in name recognition. It's quite frankly why many candidates run in the first place despite little or no chance of winning. Just to increase their name recognition for future races.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
He seems to do okay in debates where I assume they do a lot of preparation. Its all these media interviews like this where he ****s up.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
I could see more reasons why Rogans 5.5 million would be far more likely to vote and give his endorsement some weight as opposed to people listed than I care to list.
57Brave
Well-known member
Freakonomics Mar 4 podcast
nsacpi
Expects Yuge Games
https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2020/president/us/general_election_trump_vs_biden-6247.html
Biden's not a very compelling candidate. What does it say about chosen that he's been lagging so consistently in the polls.
Biden's not a very compelling candidate. What does it say about chosen that he's been lagging so consistently in the polls.
The question should be what does it say about the polling.