2020 Field

sturg33 said:
I agree with this take.

Biden boxed himself in and chose a much worse candidate.

I always though Amy was the best the Dems had to offer behind Tulsi.

I also thought Booker would have been good too.

Harris is awful
Click to expand...


He had to go with a minority women.
 
[tw]1314200030279077888[/tw]

Katko is a competent moderately conservative congressman. very poorly chosen one's presidency has been an extinction event for people like him.
 
Last edited:
Runnin said:
Would've been better how?
Click to expand...

Harris is the most fake and robotic debater I've seen in some times. She is always light on substance and has admitted what she says in debates arent what she means.

Her answer about packing the court, turning it around on race, was shameful.
 
[tw]1314089207875371008[/tw]

At least they are being honest about not liking democracy and their way of suppressing the vote and what not
 
i love that that line is used only in times like this lol


but congrats on standing with that statement against our democratic republic. lol
 
I dont agree that any of those would have been a better VP pick. The slow paced talking of both Kamala and Pence bothered me but I liked how Kamala attacked in the debate. Thats how you do it. I dont like that she dodged the Supreme Court question either, its a very simple answer. "The President has the legal authority to add justices to the Supreme Court, no one questions that, it is not done because of a longstanding precedent similar to the precedent of not confirming a Justice in an election year. In 2016, Republicans when there was a vacancy to be filled 240 days before an election, cited this precedent for their refusal to even consider any nominee of the President. We knew they were hypocrites then but we didnt think they would be so bold as to then flip on that precedent in only 4 years. So to answer the question, if Republicans throw precedents out the window then we will consider all options regardless of precedent. If precedent stands then there is a zero percent chance we add any justices to the court. I think the question that should be asked of the Trump regime is if they lose will they still try to rush their nominee through confirmation. Of course they will because they have no respect for voter or the will of the people. We very well might be in this same situation in 4 years with Republicans again doing a 180 on the issue."
 
sturg33 said:
Harris is the most fake and robotic debater I've seen in some times. She is always light on substance and has admitted what she says in debates arent what she means.

Her answer about packing the court, turning it around on race, was shameful.
Click to expand...

If you liked her, I would be very suspect.
 
sturg33 said:
Harris is the most fake and robotic debater I've seen in some times. She is always light on substance and has admitted what she says in debates arent what she means.

Her answer about packing the court, turning it around on race, was shameful.
Click to expand...

A Trump supporter saying someone is light on substance. Boy that’s rich.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top