sturg33
I
Ok and which elections in that time did the opposing party only have a 10 seat advantage to start with?
I'm not following the question?
Do you 2022 was a good election performance for republicans?
Ok and which elections in that time did the opposing party only have a 10 seat advantage to start with?
Constantly crying about it is fun and makes for a lot of fundraising opportunities but at what point to pull the plug on his ability to prove this out in a way that helps the American people ?
Sure trump has never successfully helped a candidate win election.
Your boy had to make sad sad commercials of reading trump books to his kids to win. Now the same guy is coming close to single digits while feeding lies to his supporters.
How are those Vivek narratives working for you?slurp slurp.
I'm not following the question?
Do you 2022 was a good election performance for republicans?
No but making sure that the people know what happened is immensely important.
But going along with wha the uniparty wants from you is something I’d expect of a squishy R
I once again reiterate I don't need narratives to form my brain like the Trump cult does.
What narratives are you speaking about now?
I'm still very much eager to put my money where my mouth is but I know you prefer to deny children of free money
If after 3 years you cannot even offer a number, would you not consider that failure?
Tell me which election in the past did the minority party have only a ten seat deficit that gained more than the Rs did in 22.
I know exactly what stupid lie you just pushed without context. Now I’m wondering if you’re even aware.
If you’re not allowed to test how can they number be known?
Want to tell me how this is trumps fault?
So I need to find a midterm election where the presidential party has a 10 seat or less advantage?
I'm not sure my stock screener can pull that for me.
Please do make your point though. And I ask a 3rd time do you believe the 2022 election results was a good republican performance?
It doesn't matter whose fault it is, what matters that we have failed to prove it.
I don't like rewarding failure
I bet your feelings on Vivek were strictly organic and not a result of NBD money.
Can you tell me again how he’s a Soros plant? Pharma shill? I’d love more details.
Who succeeds in that situation? By doing what?
“Not rewarding failure” in this example is akin to rewarding the uniparty efforts to not allow elections to be audited. Congratulations?
I don't know what NBD is
And yes Vivek is a former Democrat who took a soros scholarship and made his billions selling a drug that never went to market.
I don't hate anyone for being rich but do prefer it that they actually help people as the reason for it.
I'm still eager to put my money where my mouth is
The question if it was good versus historical bad performance is not what’s here.
Did I say it was “good”?
What good is Trump if all he does is come up short (being generous)
Do you have other examples of your very specific (and highly irellevent) criteria?
So he’s not a Soros plant or big pharma shill anymore?
Love how quick your language softens now thst you realize you were victim of the NBD )never back down) disinformation campaign.
Only those naive to reality think this is irrelevant. Why don’t you take some time to think about how it’s easier to win more seats when you have 250+ versus 210
Lol - he’s 73+M votes worth of good that the machine needed unprecedented cheating to defeat.
“What good is he?”
Hahaha