2024 Field

Thethe wants China destroyed. And trump wants them to do great. He likes president Xi a lot

(I know I know... bring in the translator)

[Tw]1754164830603227151[/tw]
 
Republicans only care about tax cuts and cheap labor. So there you have it.

Trump also said Mexico was gonna pay for it. In reality, Trump knew a wall stretching the vast majority of the border was unlikely to ever happen (and possibly even knew it was a dumb idea overall). But he knew it was what his supporters wanted to hear.
 
Last edited:
Trump also said Mexico was gonna pay for it. In reality, Trump knew a wall stretching the vast majority of the border was unlikely to ever happen (and possibly even knew it was a dumb idea overall). But he knew it was what his supporters wanted to hear.

Yeah it makes so much more sense to have a completely open physical border. That sounds like a piece of cake to manage.

Mexico also used troops at the border to help police during Trump.
 
My guess is the Economist's assessment is inversely correlated with thethe's IQ rating. Nonetheless I share:

GFhQAGHXAAAayYH


The other thang of interest is that the polling results appear to vary systematically depending upon whether registered voters or likely voters are the ones surveyed. very poorly chosen one does 3-4 points better in polls that are of registered voters. Or to put it another way, credibly accused creepy joe does 3-4 points better in polls that screen for likely voters.
 
My guess is the Economist's assessment is inversely correlated with thethe's IQ rating. Nonetheless I share:

GFhQAGHXAAAayYH


The other thang of interest is that the polling results appear to vary systematically depending upon whether registered voters or likely voters are the ones surveyed. very poorly chosen one does 3-4 points better in polls that are of registered voters. Or to put it another way, credibly accused creepy joe does 3-4 points better in polls that screen for likely voters.

And Trump converts registered voters into likely voters at the highest clip we have ever seen in modern politics.

Also hysterical is that the Q poll is considered very good and they are the one true outlier (always are in favor of Dems) in the whole cycle so the above figures are again something only low IQ people (but in your case spreaders of Deza) would actually take at face value.

Fitting that the economist who produces arguably the least accurate poll in the business (amongst bigger name outfits) would produce this article.
 
Last edited:
I Smoked Trump's $83.3M
@BlackKnight10k
·
21h
Every time the media tries to convince you that Biden is unpopular,

actual voters show up and hit the Biden button at the polls and

vote for Biden by a record margin.
 
I Smoked Trump's $83.3M
@BlackKnight10k
·
21h
Every time the media tries to convince you that Biden is unpopular,

actual voters show up and hit the Biden button at the polls and

vote for Biden by a record margin.

Did they say Biden was unpopular in 2020?
 
I Smoked Trump's $83.3M
@BlackKnight10k
·
21h
Every time the media tries to convince you that Biden is unpopular,

actual voters show up and hit the Biden button at the polls and

vote for Biden by a record margin.

What 4% of voters showed up in SC?
 
The Republican media certainly did.

Not the polling - Things are a bit different now.

The last time the Republican candidate had a lead in this many of the polls at this time was in 2004 and that was the last time the Republican's won the popular vote.
 
[tw]1147172530106654720[/tw]

Some people understand that people like Townsend knows what happening and some people regurgitate 'unfiltered boss' takes.
 
Lol I really don't need a rando on Twitter to tell me to understand that the system is geared to serving the bottom

Libertarianism has been saying this for decades. Too bad we've ruined the world!

But I'm glad you've found someone you feel can tell you how to think
 
[tw]1754479480167358852[/tw]

Everything I've been saying for years.

The forum will never admit I was right about 2020 and January 6th because it destroys so many narratives.
 
So according to Stefanik and Vance, if Biden loses, Harris is within her rights to not certify the election and send favorable electors. I assume this is OK with the easily grifted on this board?
 
So according to Stefanik and Vance, if Biden loses, Harris is within her rights to not certify the election and send favorable electors. I assume this is OK with the easily grifted on this board?

Way to not understand what they were saying was the VPs rights.
 
Back
Top