2024 Field

RCP average has Kamala with her largest lead to date (+2). And leading in 13 of the 18 polls released since September. Polymarket has Harris +4 on odds to win election

What is the disconnect

The disconnect seems to be that they don't account for swing states that will most certainly decide the election. We've talked ad nauseum about now Kamala needs to poll in the swing states to have a chance. If the majority of polling starts looking like she has 4 point lead in the rust belt, I will agree that she is likely to win. Until then, it's an up hill climb for Kommiela
 
The disconnect seems to be that they don't account for swing states that will most certainly decide the election. We've talked ad nauseum about now Kamala needs to poll in the swing states to have a chance. If the majority of polling starts looking like she has 4 point lead in the rust belt, I will agree that she is likely to win. Until then, it's an up hill climb for Kommiela

Look at unweighted samples in these polls. There is going to be an earthquake come Election Day.
 
[tw]1836715211329241218[/tw]

Add in polling errors we’ve seen the last two presidential cycles and I think you get the picture as to what’s about to happen.
 
Is that what it looks like?

What would be the purpose?

They know they are losing badly in the states they need to win so knowing your opponents strategy and potential dirt it’s important.

Not even sure if you’re legitimately asking this question.
 
They know they are losing badly in the states they need to win so knowing your opponents strategy and potential dirt it’s important.

Not even sure if you’re legitimately asking this question.

I think a candidate knows he’s in trouble when he labels the other side as a bunch of communists, then turns around six weeks before the election and finds himself campaigning to cap interest rates charged by private companies.
 
I think a candidate knows he’s in trouble when he labels the other side as a bunch of communists, then turns around six weeks before the election and finds himself campaigning to cap interest rates charged by private companies.

We are going to find out now won’t we.

Capping interest rates will result in more risk adverse policies for credit card companies. Non credit worthy people won’t get credit and bury themselves. Credit worthy people may be more inclined to take out more credit. Not sure the overall impact of a policy like that. I’d be interested to see real life impact of something like that because I can see both sides.
 
Yep. As they did before with oversampling dems there is a deliberate effort to spike the polls in favor of Harris

It’s not hard to see when you look under the hood. But there are influencers on the right that poison the well so lots of people just don’t get it.
 
[tw]1836734196733067362[/tw]

This is 312 for Trump. I said right after debate Kamala would stop bleeding but by end of September Trump will take a big lead.
 
[tw]1836734196733067362[/tw]

This is 312 for Trump. I said right after debate Kamala would stop bleeding but by end of September Trump will take a big lead.

There was a pollster out there (I don't remember the name) who said Trump has 60% chance of attaining 312.
 
We are going to find out now won’t we.

Capping interest rates will result in more risk adverse policies for credit card companies. Non credit worthy people won’t get credit and bury themselves. Credit worthy people may be more inclined to take out more credit. Not sure the overall impact of a policy like that. I’d be interested to see real life impact of something like that because I can see both sides.

As for the minor detail as to whether it’s constitutional?
 
As for the minor detail as to whether it’s constitutional?

I have no sympathy for predatory practices by private companies. Debtors are not innocent either but people are stupidly and make awful decisions that have negative impacts to the rest of us.
 
Back
Top