2024 Field
- Thread starter Jaw
- Start date
Same moderators that weren't supposed to fact check but decided to do it to Vance?
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
You call me a Democrat despite there being 3580356956195625 people I would rather be President than Joe Biden or Kamala. Hell I would even rather you be President and I dont even like you. I am a flexible dude. How about Rand Paul. Corey Gardner. Classy Ben Sasse. Thomas Masse. I will even vote for Matt "Its legal in Georgia" Gaetz.
chop2chip
Well-known member
Yup. I thought those same moderators led a good debate that was heavily policy focused and did a good job asking follow up questions when each candidate gave non-answers. Both Walz and Vance repeatedly made remarks throughout how they appreciated the civility of the discourse.
They’re only connected in the sense that it’s population of asylum seekers and disadvantaged people. If you want to have a discussion on how many people we should let in that fall under that umbrella, you can do so without obfuscating the legal status of these migrants to make them seem more sinister to people who otherwise support legal immigration.
57Brave
Well-known member
Rapid Response Team --- Lives
JD Vance told a bald faced lie and got caught
as 3/4 the earths population knew he would
Why do they lie ?
No on in 9 years has answered that question.
In fact no one since the Bush 43 administration ( yellow cake) has answered that question
Is it the facts dont support their unpopular beliefs so they find it necessary to create their own facts ?
Isn't the creating of false facts for public consumption, be it dishonest reasons to take us to war or vilifying a nationality of people , knowingly they are engaging in falsehoods.
Or are they convenient truths?
JD Vance told a bald faced lie and got caught
as 3/4 the earths population knew he would
Why do they lie ?
No on in 9 years has answered that question.
In fact no one since the Bush 43 administration ( yellow cake) has answered that question
Is it the facts dont support their unpopular beliefs so they find it necessary to create their own facts ?
Isn't the creating of false facts for public consumption, be it dishonest reasons to take us to war or vilifying a nationality of people , knowingly they are engaging in falsehoods.
Or are they convenient truths?
Last edited by a moderator:
No becuase he doesn't have name recognition at this point to win a national election.
Hold on - Does your side lie?
57Brave
Well-known member
Does the mean lady know the rules that were agreed upon prior to the debate?
That’s a really weak point in what should be a strong area for Conservatives today. Limitations to the First Amendment exist, and “yelling fire in a crowded room” is a very generally understood shorthand for those limitations. I’d focus less on calling him a liar over this and more on pushing back against the government doing censorship personally.