2024 Field

thethe said:
I also don't think as a party we should be selecting our candidates or messages based on idiot upper middle class wine moms who decided to destroy the nation because their feelings were hurt because of some tweets.
Click to expand...

I'm "selecting" him because I believe he is objectively a much better person to lead than Trump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
I just want to be clear. The reasoning of he didn't win in 2020 as the predicate that he shouldn't run in 2024 is crazy to me.

At this point we KNOW the election was stolen. Only a matter of time until the ballot trafficking operation is completely shown the light of day as well as those 140K 'Pristine' mail in ballots in GA that the Democrats and Establishment Republicans are doing absolutely everything to keep under closed doors.
 
thethe said:
I also don't think as a party we should be selecting our candidates or messages based on idiot upper middle class wine moms who decided to destroy the nation because their feelings were hurt because of some tweets.
Click to expand...

So you don’t want to worry about the primary reason your team lost?
 
Just like Russian Collusion / Just like Russian bounties / Just like COVID origination / etc...


There will be a time where it will be 75% agreement that the 2020 election was stolen.
 
I don't disagree that Trump can win. I think he would win, assuming everything is legit. I think - if everything was legit - he easily wins 2020 without covid.

But he was ineffective in a lot of things. Give me the guy who I also think will win AND be a much better leader
 
sturg33 said:
I don't disagree that Trump can win. I think he would win, assuming everything is legit. I think - if everything was legit - he easily wins 2020 without covid.

But he was ineffective in a lot of things. Give me the guy who I also think will win AND be a much better leader
Click to expand...

I have no issues with any of this.

If Desantis chooses to run then the people will decide.
 
Tbh- I think it’s Ronnie Ballgames fight to lose.

More interested in who Dems put forward and their record on Covid/governing/response in a real debate. Some of those positions are hard to defend
 
Tapate50 said:
Tbh- I think it’s Ronnie Ballgames fight to lose.

More interested in who Dems put forward and their record on Covid/governing/response in a real debate. Some of those positions are hard to defend
Click to expand...


Tulsi Gabbard has been **** talking Biden for the past week. Seems like she’ll be running
 
thethe said:
And then you have to weight this against the turnout that trump gets in every single state.

Bottom line is as long as election integrity is assured republicans are cleaning house regardless of who is on the top of the ticket.

Just less Lindsey Graham’s please.
Click to expand...

As was mentioned in a previous post. Every single state doesn't matter in the Presidential election. But I would bet good money that group of people that actively voted against Trump that never vote far outweigh those that voted for Trump who never vote.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Jaw
thewupk said:
Let's put this into five groups of voters.

As was mentioned in a previous post. Every single state doesn't matter in the Presidential election. But I would bet good money that group of people that actively voted against Trump that never vote far outweigh those that voted for Trump who never vote.
Click to expand...

Its all conjecture on both of our parts but I believe that the composition of the votes in the swing states are highly misleading and if you took out all the obvious fraud you would see that the converse of your statement is the truth.
 
Krgrecw said:
Tulsi Gabbard has been **** talking Biden for the past week. Seems like she’ll be running
Click to expand...

I mean she has normal, productive viewpoints. Hard not to like her at this point. I'd certainly consider her.

Maybe Hillary won't publicly label her a Russian asset this time around.
 
Tapate50 said:
I mean she has normal, productive viewpoints. Hard not to like her at this point. I'd certainly consider her.

Maybe Hillary won't publicly label her a Russian asset this time around.
Click to expand...

her economics views are a train wreck... or at least they used to be
 
Shes also pro-science in terms of genders.

If we stopped handing all of our money to the MIC and countries overseas that hate us I think everyone would be surprised with what we could do with tax policy and domestic safety nets.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top