2024 Field

I'm sorry that accurate quotes of what you said leave you feeling uncomfortable. You have my sympathies.
 
sturg33 said:
That's what you said... i dont understand why such a rational and normal bill would be a gift to democratic voter turnout, unless you knew it was dishonestly portrayed and used it for political advantages.

which of course we all knew yall didn't care about the snacks. that was all nonsense which is why we kept mocking you about it. you and your propagandists in the ny times and wapo went with it to call on jim crow nonsense, get an entire all star game moved, all for a bunch of lies that you either fell for or spread.

not sure which is worse but you are a piece of ****, fyi
Click to expand...

and as a reminder to the seals...

the lecturing buffoon knew this bill wasn't jim crow... but was very glad his president, media propagandists, and idiot voters fell for it

take that as you wish
 
Btw I will concede one quote as somewhat dishonest on my part. You never said Trudeau is worse than Putin. What you said is Trudeau is as bad as Putin. Moreover you said Trudeau is more dishonest than Putin. So I combined the two because to me being as bad as plus being more dishonest equals being worse.

But since you never actually said that Trudeau is worse than Putin I will concede your point and delete that entry from my list of your classics. The remainder are entirely accurate.

See it is therapeutic when you admit to distorting or mischaracterizing what someone said.
 
nsacpi said:
Btw I will concede one quote as somewhat dishonest on my part. You never said Trudeau is worse than Putin. What you said is Trudeau is as bad as Putin. Moreover you said Trudeau is more dishonest than Putin. So I combined the two because to me being as bad as plus being more dishonest equals being worse.

But since you never actually said that Trudeau is worse than Putin I will concede your point and delete that entry from my list of your classics.

See it is therapeutic when you admit to distorting what someone said.
Click to expand...

you can't even get your corrections right

what i said was they they are both tyrants, and that putin is more honest about it

unlike you my memory isn't so bad i can remember things without consulting my notepad on my screen
 
Btw China has invaded or occupied other countries multiple times in our lifetimes. In addition to occupying Tibet, it has fought a war with Vietnam and killed Russians and Indians over border disputes. It should also be pointed out that its claims of Taiwan being part of China are dubious. Japan has recently been the ruler of Taiwan (something recognized by the Treaty of Taiwan in 1895). But we all are impressed by you carrying water for the CCP!
 
Last edited:
and where did you even get the vermont seeds thing? did you just make that up? or wanted to forget it was your girl who actually did do that?
 
sturg33 said:
you can't even get your corrections right

what i said was they they are both tyrants, and that putin is more honest about it

unlike you my memory isn't so bad i can remember things without consulting my notepad on my screen
Click to expand...

You said Trudeau is just as bad as Putin. Those were your exact words.
 
sturg33 said:
and where did you even get the vermont seeds thing? did you just make that up? or wanted to forget it was your girl who actually did do that?
Click to expand...

It is one of the nonsensical things you said. I would find it if it would make a difference. But I need to be compensated for my efforts.
 
The Chosen One said:
Trump has a 93% win rate on endorsements right now in 2022 after 100 races.

A small few of these were unopposed establishment people who have already bent the knee to him.

But let’s not pretend his influence on the party has waned.
Click to expand...

Erick Erickson hypothesized that a Trump endorsement is useful in a field of unknowns or for a challenger when there's known dissatisfaction with the incumbent. The vast majority of Georgia Pubs don't think Raffensperger is guilty of letting someone hack the election, and Kemp has been a pleasantly competent surprise after a buffoonish primary campaign. And there was no way he was going to lose the primary after pushing Constitutional Carry through, none.
 
Jaw said:
Erick Erickson hypothesized that a Trump endorsement is useful in a field of unknowns or for a challenger when there's known dissatisfaction with the incumbent. The vast majority of Georgia Pubs don't think Raffensperger is guilty of letting someone hack the election, and Kemp has been a pleasantly competent surprise after a buffoonish primary campaign. And there was no way he was going to lose the primary after pushing Constitutional Carry through, none.
Click to expand...

Correct.
 
This cannot be true bc the super intelligent lecturer assured me that the GOP was dead for decades.

I look forward to collecting on that

[Tw]1534938527665950721[/tw]
 
Yowza. Something tells me the lecturing buffoon may have gotten yet another thing wrong with his lectures about the GOP being dead this November

[Tw]1536896640803647493[/tw]
 
Trump will go down as the most influential political figure in the last hundred years. Not that the left didn’t help but the way the Hispanic demographic has flipped is nothing short of remarkable. Black men will vote for trump 25+% in 2024.
 
I like to picture the lecturer crying in his bedroom going through his Twitter feed.

It’s over for the incompetent class of academics.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top