2024 Field
- Thread starter Jaw
- Start date
Yeah - No other R cnadidate would have won so Mitchs tact would have had no impact.
But LOL at trying to say Mitch had MORE to do with it. That right there is a big time joke.
Well contrary to what you and the Desimp influencers think the majority of the ocuntry knows something was wrong with the 2020 election and if we don't have control of the election process nothing matters.
Acting like there is a more important issue is naive.
ITs a terrible thing when Republicans lose as a result and then more radical pro-abortion policies get passed.
But you don't look at things over long term. Just short term satisfcation.
sturg33
I
If you claim to care about "electability" then you should abandon that issue asap. most people don't wanna hear about it
sturg33
I
Ahh... so we're back to the "when we actually win elections (rare these days under the MAGA party)... then we mustn't advance our policies because then the left will be mad at us!!" argument
so weak and pathetic.
also not in reality. Kemp won his election. so did Kim Reynolds. So did Greg Abbot.
The people who can't seem to win their elections are the one lecturing us about how we must appease leftists in order to win elections
And yet Trump talks about it still and somehow all of the polling shows that he has gained support with women/indepdendents/minorites.
Oh I forgot - All the polling companies are conspiring to help trump win the nomination.
Everywhere abortion was put up as an issue to vote on it fails.
Those are just hte results and you can not like that all you want but hte people of this country are speaking and I'd rather not a losing issue be the forefront which will result in more dead babies in the future.
cajunrevenge
Well-known member
Wait, you aren't going to argue it only lost because of voter fraud?
sturg33
I
I don't think you wanna go down the "those are just the results" argument when discussing elections
sturg33
I
The cult cares about winning polls
Non listless vessels care about winning elections and advancing our policy
sturg33
I
You'd think being exposed over and over as a pathetic listless vessel wpuld.embarass the cult but they have no shame
[Tw]1703787998024806497[/tw]
sturg33
I
Before thethe became a listless vessel, he had strong opinions on the unwavering support for life
But now Trump says its a terrible thing and the cult falls in line.
So sad to see play out
But now Trump says its a terrible thing and the cult falls in line.
So sad to see play out
You do realize that there is middle ground between a 6 week ban which is highly unpopular and third trimerster which is highly unpopular.
Its like you don't understand anything. You can still make the left defend their principles by pushing a more European second trimester limit.
And it all goes back to what strategy leads to the least amount of babies being killed longterm. You want to feel good about yourself and in the process will end up with more babies being killed.
sturg33
I
Cool so now Democrat politicians can go and make the argument that instead of 6 weeks, they need 9 months
Now they have to get elected, and pass that law. Now they have to define their monstrosities.
In the meantime, thousands of babies are being saved.
You are the squishy GOP you always bitch about. No backbone. No spine. Try to placate the left.
Pathetic
No, they don't have to make that argument.
They can say look at these monters forcing taking contorl of your body even after 6 weeks when most don't even know they are pregnant.
Thats what you don't understand. Putting at 6 weeks allows them to be on the offensive and with what we have seen nationally its a losing issue.
But I guess you want to lose so you can feel better about your moral righteousness.
The squishy GOP is the one before Trump that didn't care about pro-life at all. Now they had the biggest win they've had in their life and they want to throw it away because they can't see hte long term picture.
And the 'Thousands' being saved is because of Trump.