2024 Field

thethe said:
[tw]1720100962852098500[/tw]

Should definitely continue to nominate people that push for strict abortion restrictions and shooting migrants at the border. Thats going to play over real well.

BUT HE WAS RE-ELECTED IN A DEEP RED STATE!

Idiots
Click to expand...

I know you're too much of a bitch to engage me directly

But as a conservative, I'm not interested in your squishy moderate leftism. If that is the direction MAGA wants, good riddance.

enjoy your continued losses

idiots
 
sturg33 said:
But the great magadonian is still ignoring me bc he keeps getting humiliated in these arguments... so if someone else wants to ask him so he has permission to proxy respond.

Help me understand the maga position... which is in this thread stating that we must first win elections and then pass baby-saving legislation.

How is that not precisely what we did in Florida, Texas, Iowa, and others? And why was doing so a "terrible thing"?

If it was wrong to pass these after winning elections in 2022? Why is it not going to be wrong after winning an election in 2024?

(I'm fully aware MAGA doesn't have much experience winning elections, so they may not understand that there are some who actually did and advanced the policies they supposedly support)
Click to expand...

tap, can you get an answer from the magadonian?

it seems to me he has gone fully against baby-saving legislation. can you confirm?
 
Trump is going full Bernie sanders leftist and his idiot listless vessel cult is cheering it on

These people are stupider than I ever imagined

[Tw]1720122185212105200[/tw]
 
[tw]1720128628980343249[/tw]

Small government Conservatives and LIbertarians ALWAYS miss the mark and don't know what time in history we are in.
 
The smaller the election the greater the ability to cheat. The fact remains there is a legitimate way to challenge the results of an election and requires real proof not just feelings.
 
Via lawsuit or ruling by 2/3rds of Congress after an objection in writing signed by a member of the House and Senate. For example in the 1960 Hawaii election Democrats sued and a Judge ruled that the electoral votes for the state go to the Democratic nominee citing the results of the recount that changes the winner.
 
thethe said:
[tw]1720128628980343249[/tw]

Small government Conservatives and LIbertarians ALWAYS miss the mark and don't know what time in history we are in.
Click to expand...

Yes!!! Federally funded free education!!!!

Glad there are gonna be 3 socialists on the ballot.

What a joke this movement has become
 
cajunrevenge said:
Via lawsuit or ruling by 2/3rds of Congress after an objection in writing signed by a member of the House and Senate. For example in the 1960 Hawaii election Democrats sued and a Judge ruled that the electoral votes for the state go to the Democratic nominee citing the results of the recount that changes the winner.
Click to expand...

Oh you mean the majority of cases that were thrown out based on procedure and not hte merits?

Nice little scheme you've got there....
 
It's amazing how similar Trump and Biden are.

They want to print trillions of dollars

they don't want to touch entitlements that are bankrupting us

They want free education for all

They want to send money to Americans to not work

They are pro-abortion

They are both gun grabbers

They both love lockdowns and Fauci


MAGA has become as stupid as leftists...
 
It's not my fault the majority of Trump's lawsuits were so baseless they didn't even pass the most basic of standards. If you try and sue to overturn a result and you cite no evidence except "I read a claim on the Internet by AssBlaster5000" it's not going to go very far.
 
cajunrevenge said:
It's not my fault the majority of Trump's lawsuits were so baseless they didn't even pass the most basic of standards. If you try and sue to overturn a result and you cite no evidence except "I read a claim on the Internet by AssBlaster5000" it's not going to go very far.
Click to expand...

"You can't challenge an election before it happens becuase there is no injury"

Ok cool - Here are some election lawsuits after the election

"You can't challenge these elections because you have no standing"

Oh great - Thanks for letting the cheating take place!
 
If you want to discuss the lawsuits then let's discuss them individually instead of just vomitting vague statements. Which lawsuits do you need explained to you
 
cajunrevenge said:
If you want to discuss the lawsuits then let's discuss them individually instead of just vomitting vague statements. Which lawsuits do you need explained to you
Click to expand...

This has already been discussed and its been shown ad nauseum that the casees were overwhelmingly decided on procedural issues and not actual merits. Something that you always gloss over.
 
You spam this place with BS so either put up or shut up. You need the lack of context that comes with vague generalized statements because when we talk about the actual court cases there are legal and logical basis for the rulings. Even Trump's own appointed Judges rules against you. So again, being up specific court cases.
 
cajunrevenge said:
You spam this place with BS so either put up or shut up. You need the lack of context that comes with vague generalized statements because when we talk about the actual court cases there are legal and logical basis for the rulings. Even Trump's own appointed Judges rules against you. So again, being up specific court cases.
Click to expand...

Ok - I will find you a detailed discussion on the breakdown of cases and will post it here.

YOu pick a case and we will discuss.
 
I dont see why I should have to start since you are making the claim but nevertheless here you go.





This encompasses more than one case but I am posting it for just the Pennsylvania lawsuit.
 
[tw]1720146561168998868[/tw]

One of the smartest living humans is basically telling the world he believes the 2020 election was stolen.

Pay attention
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top