2028

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...2028-platform-162-reports-180-days-socialism/

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Arizona), likely to run for president, has made his opening bid in the 2028 ideas primary. It’s a doozy.

He recently proposed legislation with Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pennsylvania) that would form a commission, add six presidential advisers, create seven task forces and require the writing of at least 162 reports, all in the name of “affordability.” And there’s some socialism as the cherry on top.

The core of Kelly’s plan is to declare the cost of living a national emergency for 180 days. He would create a new Cost-of-Living Emergency Office inside the president’s Council of Economic Advisers. The chair of the council would then appoint new special advisers to oversee groceries, housing, utilities, health care, transportation and wages.

Those czars would each assemble a task force. They would meet at least once every seven days and prepare a weekly report about costs in their purview. They would also hold regional listening sessions and publish reports about those as well.

The CEA would write a report every three months containing statistics that other government agencies already collect and report on household budgets.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the White House would require each agency to prepare a statement about whether new regulations might affect household costs or benefit large corporations.

The attorney general and the Federal Trade Commission would form a joint task force to enforce “price-gouging” laws. This task force would also have a mandate to issue lots of reports.

…

The bill says that the president’s production commands must be supported by empirical data. That’s hardly any comfort. The Soviet economic planning agency, Gosplan, had a massive computer system to process all the data any economic planner could ever want. The problem is the act of central planning in the first place.

—————

Hard pass.
 
acesfull86 said:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...2028-platform-162-reports-180-days-socialism/

Sen. Mark Kelly (D-Arizona), likely to run for president, has made his opening bid in the 2028 ideas primary. It’s a doozy.

He recently proposed legislation with Rep. Chris Deluzio (D-Pennsylvania) that would form a commission, add six presidential advisers, create seven task forces and require the writing of at least 162 reports, all in the name of “affordability.” And there’s some socialism as the cherry on top.

The core of Kelly’s plan is to declare the cost of living a national emergency for 180 days. He would create a new Cost-of-Living Emergency Office inside the president’s Council of Economic Advisers. The chair of the council would then appoint new special advisers to oversee groceries, housing, utilities, health care, transportation and wages.

Those czars would each assemble a task force. They would meet at least once every seven days and prepare a weekly report about costs in their purview. They would also hold regional listening sessions and publish reports about those as well.

The CEA would write a report every three months containing statistics that other government agencies already collect and report on household budgets.
The Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs in the White House would require each agency to prepare a statement about whether new regulations might affect household costs or benefit large corporations.

The attorney general and the Federal Trade Commission would form a joint task force to enforce “price-gouging” laws. This task force would also have a mandate to issue lots of reports.

…

The bill says that the president’s production commands must be supported by empirical data. That’s hardly any comfort. The Soviet economic planning agency, Gosplan, had a massive computer system to process all the data any economic planner could ever want. The problem is the act of central planning in the first place.

—————

Hard pass.
Click to expand...


Shocker a democrat wants more government to ebezzle from
 
It's looking like Beshear and Shapiro are both serious about 2028 or at least exploring it. Beshear will be speaking at NH Democratic Party Convention. I was scrolling through my Youtube and I see Kylie Kelce did a video with Shapiro.

Anyone but Newsome though really for me. Voting for Newsome is almost as bad as voting for MAGA.
 
zitothebrave said:
It's looking like Beshear and Shapiro are both serious about 2028 or at least exploring it. Beshear will be speaking at NH Democratic Party Convention. I was scrolling through my Youtube and I see Kylie Kelce did a video with Shapiro.

Anyone but Newsome though really for me. Voting for Newsome is almost as bad as voting for MAGA.
Click to expand...
Kamala will be your nominee.
 
zitothebrave said:
It's looking like Beshear and Shapiro are both serious about 2028 or at least exploring it. Beshear will be speaking at NH Democratic Party Convention. I was scrolling through my Youtube and I see Kylie Kelce did a video with Shapiro.

Anyone but Newsome though really for me. Voting for Newsome is almost as bad as voting for MAGA.
Click to expand...

Think Beshear would be my preference, but he unfortunately doesn't have the "rizz" needed.

The risk is very much live that Kamala swoops in imo. I don't want it myself, but she's camping out in the south this year to try to lock down the black vote and the black preference typically doesn't get beaten in the Democratic party. If it is beaten, it will probably be by a progressive populist (maybe not AOC though as it seems like she may decline and attempt to primary Schumer) that causes the youth to be extremely excited and push out to vote in droves. (the other two ways that Kamala ends up failing will either be A. the DNC cuts a deal to get her to stay away, which I think may well be possible because they seem fine with a left populist takeover occurring or B. money like 2019/2020)

And if I'm being honest, fck populism. Both sides too.
 
thethe said:
Why?
Click to expand...
Because she has no shot. Not in 2028. She needs to do so much building. 2028 is Newsome, Shapiro, Ossoff, Kelly, or Beshear. Theres room for some dark horses who run,

The number of people who lost their first election Only one president since the CIvil War has lost their first election to become elected again, Nixon. She won't be on the ticket. She won't win the primary. She can run on identity politics but she won't be the only minority/woman candidate and people will avoid her.
 
zitothebrave said:
Because she has no shot. Not in 2028. She needs to do so much building. 2028 is Newsome, Shapiro, Ossoff, Kelly, or Beshear. Theres room for some dark horses who run,

The number of people who lost their first election Only one president since the CIvil War has lost their first election to become elected again, Nixon. She won't be on the ticket. She won't win the primary. She can run on identity politics but she won't be the only minority/woman candidate and people will avoid her.
Click to expand...

Zito - Black people vote for black people if a black person is an option.

Thats just how it goes and she will get enough women to also support her.

Also, no candidate had a 'first election' similar to Kamala so her message is that she could not have possibly won when given no time. The reality is her support was always astroturfed and would have fallen further with more time.
 
Last edited:
thethe said:
Zito - Black people vote for black people if a black person is an option.

Thats just how it goes and she will get enough women to also support her.

Also, no candidate had a 'first election' similar to Kamala so her message is that she could not have possibly won when given no time. The reality is her support was always astroturfed and would have fallen further with more time.
Click to expand...
If that was true why didn't Kamala win in 2020? She needs someone else to win to become AG or Sec State to revive her value. Or another Dem Loss and to begin moving to a more moderate consistent move.

She will not carry enough people to win the nominationw ithout appropriate back room deals and I don't see that happeneing.
 
zitothebrave said:
If that was true why didn't Kamala win in 2020? She needs someone else to win to become AG or Sec State to revive her value. Or another Dem Loss and to begin moving to a more moderate consistent move.

She will not carry enough people to win the nominationw ithout appropriate back room deals and I don't see that happeneing.
Click to expand...
Clyburn had massive sway and brought support to Biden.
 
zitothebrave said:
If that was true why didn't Kamala win in 2020? She needs someone else to win to become AG or Sec State to revive her value. Or another Dem Loss and to begin moving to a more moderate consistent move.

She will not carry enough people to win the nominationw ithout appropriate back room deals and I don't see that happeneing.
Click to expand...
It’s very true.

The black churches vote for whoever the pastor$ tell them to
 
thethe said:
The point of that black politicians control the black vote?
Click to expand...
Is it true black politicians have bigger dicks than white politicians and that the underlying truth of was has been passed off for political expression here lately is in fact, black penis envy ?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top